This Feature summarizes why and how vertical merger enforcement should be invigorated. In our modem market system, vigorous vertical merger enforcement is a necessity. Strong enforcement is particularly important in markets where economies of scale and network effects lead to barriers to entry and durable market power. Even when there are parallel vertical mergers, the result may well be an anticompetitive reciprocal dealing, coordinated equilibrium rather than intense competition among efficient integrated firms. Stronger enforcement would involve several steps, including recognition that claims of elimination of double marginalization do not deserve to be silver bullets and that behavioral remedies are generally unable to prevent anticomp...
Few people would disagree with the proposition that horizontal mergers have the potential to restric...
Recently, federal regulators responsible for enforcing the antitrust laws have shown a renewed inter...
Since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challenger...
This Feature summarizes why and how vertical merger enforcement should be invigorated. In our modern...
There seems to be consensus that the Department of Justice’s 1984 Vertical Merger Guidelines do not ...
The new Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Vertical Merger Guidelines focus attentio...
The antitrust enforcement Agencies\u27 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines introduce a nontechnical appl...
A common justification that economists have historically given for why competition authorities shoul...
We have revised our earlier listing of vertical merger enforcement actions by the Department of Just...
Mergers and acquisitions are a major component of antitrust law and practice. The U.S. antitrust age...
With the adoption of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines, the U.S. antitrust agencies have updated t...
Analyzing mergers between firms in a customer-supplier relationship under section 7 of the Clayton A...
The past forty years have witnessed a remarkable transformation in horizontal merger enforcement in ...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This slide deck was the author’s presentation at the FTC Hearings on Vertical Mergers (November 1, 2...
Few people would disagree with the proposition that horizontal mergers have the potential to restric...
Recently, federal regulators responsible for enforcing the antitrust laws have shown a renewed inter...
Since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challenger...
This Feature summarizes why and how vertical merger enforcement should be invigorated. In our modern...
There seems to be consensus that the Department of Justice’s 1984 Vertical Merger Guidelines do not ...
The new Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Vertical Merger Guidelines focus attentio...
The antitrust enforcement Agencies\u27 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines introduce a nontechnical appl...
A common justification that economists have historically given for why competition authorities shoul...
We have revised our earlier listing of vertical merger enforcement actions by the Department of Just...
Mergers and acquisitions are a major component of antitrust law and practice. The U.S. antitrust age...
With the adoption of the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines, the U.S. antitrust agencies have updated t...
Analyzing mergers between firms in a customer-supplier relationship under section 7 of the Clayton A...
The past forty years have witnessed a remarkable transformation in horizontal merger enforcement in ...
The DOJ-FTC Merger Guidelines were developed for and best deal with horizontal mergers where the the...
This slide deck was the author’s presentation at the FTC Hearings on Vertical Mergers (November 1, 2...
Few people would disagree with the proposition that horizontal mergers have the potential to restric...
Recently, federal regulators responsible for enforcing the antitrust laws have shown a renewed inter...
Since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1963 decision in Philadelphia National Bank, antitrust challenger...