Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was so often claimed? This Article questions assumptions about consensus and constitutionalism that undergird claims about judicial backlash, and explores some constructive functions of conflict in our constitutional order. The debate over same-sex marriage illustrates that conflict, constrained by constitutional culture, can forge meanings and bonds that strengthen the constitutional order. Constitutional culture, on this account, includes the understandings about role that guide interactions among citizens and officials who disagree about the Constitution\u27s meaning. Analyzing the long-running conflict over same-sex marriage with attention t...
The high profile contemporary controversy about whether to allow same-sex couples to marry has obscu...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
The significance of the events of 2016 for the future development of constitutional law has been wid...
There are few issues that excite lawyers and law students more than samesex marriage recognition. Th...
What a long, strange trip it’s been from Bowers v. Hardwick to Obergefell v. Hodges. Less than thirt...
Proponents fighting for the recognition of same-sex marriage as well as the legal ability to enter i...
This article critically analyses the recent US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v Hodges, the sa...
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), legalizing sa...
More than a year ago, the US Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples across the country had the ri...
Beginning in the 1970s, the overwhelming success of anti-gay ballot questions made direct democracy ...
Do courts matter?Historically, many social movements have turned to the courts to help achieve sweep...
The high profile contemporary controversy about whether to allow same-sex couples to marry has obscu...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
The significance of the events of 2016 for the future development of constitutional law has been wid...
There are few issues that excite lawyers and law students more than samesex marriage recognition. Th...
What a long, strange trip it’s been from Bowers v. Hardwick to Obergefell v. Hodges. Less than thirt...
Proponents fighting for the recognition of same-sex marriage as well as the legal ability to enter i...
This article critically analyses the recent US Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v Hodges, the sa...
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), legalizing sa...
More than a year ago, the US Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples across the country had the ri...
Beginning in the 1970s, the overwhelming success of anti-gay ballot questions made direct democracy ...
Do courts matter?Historically, many social movements have turned to the courts to help achieve sweep...
The high profile contemporary controversy about whether to allow same-sex couples to marry has obscu...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...
This article assesses the debate over “moral reading” and “originalist” approaches to constitutional...