Replies to comments made by G. E. Gignac on the current authors\u27 original article . Gignac reanalyzed the factor structure of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) and found results that differed from those the authors obtained initially. The authors tracked down the surprising sources of those discrepancies. G. E. Gignac\u27s hierarchical model of emotional intelligence appears promising, and the authors anticipate that further investigations of the MSCEIT factor structure may yield additional information
In two studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
This thesis presents the results from three papers assessing the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligenc...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
MacCann, Matthews, and Roberts (2012) and Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso (2012) have offered responses t...
The internal structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) ...
There has been some debate recently over the scoring, reliability and factor structure of ability me...
An unresolved but pertinent issue in the field of emotional intelligence (EI) is factorial validity....
Current measures of ability emotional intelligence (EI)--including the well-known Mayer-Salovey-Caru...
A sample of 183 medical students completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSC...
In 2 studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer\u2013Salovey\u2...
study investigated the validity of the Perceiving Emotions branch of the Mayer-Salovey-\ud Caruso Em...
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligenc...
The criterion groups validity of emotional intelligence according to Mayer & Salovey (1997), abi...
In two studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
This thesis presents the results from three papers assessing the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligenc...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
MacCann, Matthews, and Roberts (2012) and Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso (2012) have offered responses t...
The internal structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) ...
There has been some debate recently over the scoring, reliability and factor structure of ability me...
An unresolved but pertinent issue in the field of emotional intelligence (EI) is factorial validity....
Current measures of ability emotional intelligence (EI)--including the well-known Mayer-Salovey-Caru...
A sample of 183 medical students completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSC...
In 2 studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer\u2013Salovey\u2...
study investigated the validity of the Perceiving Emotions branch of the Mayer-Salovey-\ud Caruso Em...
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligenc...
The criterion groups validity of emotional intelligence according to Mayer & Salovey (1997), abi...
In two studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
This thesis presents the results from three papers assessing the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
The ability approach has been indicated as promising for advancing research in emotional intelligenc...