Deep moral disagreements must sometimes be worked through, rather than around. In The Ethics of Disagreement, I first examine a particular case in which a deep disagreement must be worked through, and then draw on work in philosophy of mind and epistemology to set the philosophical foundations for two approaches to deep disagreements that promise to help us make our way more virtuously through them. Illiberal persons resist liberal values, and so also liberal justice, but liberals cannot in good conscience simply overlook their commitment to liberal justice to accommodate disagreement with the illiberal. Insofar as we do insist on liberal justice, however, illiberal persons become subject to coercive legislation whose justificatory merits ...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. September 2014. Major: Psychology. Advisors: Eugene Borg...
How should liberal democratic states deal with conflicting claims of justice, which – similarly reas...
When people disagree about what is moral, we face an epistemological challenge—when the answer to a ...
Scholars have long recognized the existence of myriad widespread deep disagreements on values, justi...
We frequently find ourselves in intractable disagreements about the morality of abortion euthanasia,...
Disagreement represents a peculiar feature of the political life of contemporary liberal and democra...
Moral disagreement is not only a philosophically interesting matter in its own right, but is also a ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Can’t we all disagree more constructively? Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in political p...
This chapter discusses the nature and value of political disagreement, with reference to contemporar...
Political liberalism contains a commitment to public justification. The exercise of coercion on the ...
What is the epistemological significance of deep disagreement? Part I explored the nature of deep di...
This paper presents a challenge to conciliationist views of disagreement. I argue that con...
Arguments from disagreement against moral realism begin by calling attention to widespread, fundamen...
In this dissertation I draw upon Donald Davidson\u27s theories of language and the mental in order t...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. September 2014. Major: Psychology. Advisors: Eugene Borg...
How should liberal democratic states deal with conflicting claims of justice, which – similarly reas...
When people disagree about what is moral, we face an epistemological challenge—when the answer to a ...
Scholars have long recognized the existence of myriad widespread deep disagreements on values, justi...
We frequently find ourselves in intractable disagreements about the morality of abortion euthanasia,...
Disagreement represents a peculiar feature of the political life of contemporary liberal and democra...
Moral disagreement is not only a philosophically interesting matter in its own right, but is also a ...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Can’t we all disagree more constructively? Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in political p...
This chapter discusses the nature and value of political disagreement, with reference to contemporar...
Political liberalism contains a commitment to public justification. The exercise of coercion on the ...
What is the epistemological significance of deep disagreement? Part I explored the nature of deep di...
This paper presents a challenge to conciliationist views of disagreement. I argue that con...
Arguments from disagreement against moral realism begin by calling attention to widespread, fundamen...
In this dissertation I draw upon Donald Davidson\u27s theories of language and the mental in order t...
University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. September 2014. Major: Psychology. Advisors: Eugene Borg...
How should liberal democratic states deal with conflicting claims of justice, which – similarly reas...
When people disagree about what is moral, we face an epistemological challenge—when the answer to a ...