Scholars of popular constitutionalism have persuasively argued that an array of nonjudicial actors—social movements, the federal political branches, state and local political entities—play an important role in shaping constitutional meaning. To date, the accounts of such scholars have largely focused on the ways that constitutional doctrine at the Supreme Court level can be infiltrated and shaped by such popular constitutional influences. In this Essay, Professor Katie Eyer draws on the events following the Obama Administration’s February 2011 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) announcement—and the history of gay equality litigation that preceded it—to develop a theory of the lower federal courts as participants in the popular constitutionalism...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
The chapters aims at analyzing the contribution that constitutional courts gave to the advancement o...
On June 26th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down a much anticipated decision answering...
Do courts matter?Historically, many social movements have turned to the courts to help achieve sweep...
The ongoing debates over the legitimacy of judicial review-the power of courts to strike down uncons...
Popular constitutionalism scholarship has often left out the American people. Sure, ordinary citizen...
Professor Lani Guinier and others have recently developed a theory called “demosprudence” that expla...
The theory of Popular Constitutionalism posits that American social change precedes legal change. U...
This essay explores how presidents who wish to seize a leadership role over the development of right...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
This essay is a chapter to be included in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on the U.S. Constitution. ...
The rise of the Tea Party movement followed a period during which many academic students of constitu...
It is a pleasure and a privilege to comment on Larry Kramer\u27s 2002 Jorde Lecture. Beautifully cra...
One of the most important recent developments in American legal theory is the burgeoning interest in...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
The chapters aims at analyzing the contribution that constitutional courts gave to the advancement o...
On June 26th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down a much anticipated decision answering...
Do courts matter?Historically, many social movements have turned to the courts to help achieve sweep...
The ongoing debates over the legitimacy of judicial review-the power of courts to strike down uncons...
Popular constitutionalism scholarship has often left out the American people. Sure, ordinary citizen...
Professor Lani Guinier and others have recently developed a theory called “demosprudence” that expla...
The theory of Popular Constitutionalism posits that American social change precedes legal change. U...
This essay explores how presidents who wish to seize a leadership role over the development of right...
Did backlash to judicial decisions play a destructive role in debates over same-sex marriage, as was...
This essay is a chapter to be included in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on the U.S. Constitution. ...
The rise of the Tea Party movement followed a period during which many academic students of constitu...
It is a pleasure and a privilege to comment on Larry Kramer\u27s 2002 Jorde Lecture. Beautifully cra...
One of the most important recent developments in American legal theory is the burgeoning interest in...
The lecture was delivered on 16 March 2016.In the decades before the United States Supreme Court rec...
The chapters aims at analyzing the contribution that constitutional courts gave to the advancement o...
On June 26th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down a much anticipated decision answering...