Sydenham states that Octavian is also a moneyer of this coin. He identifies the date as 40 B.C.E. instead of the date of 42 B.C.E.identified by Crawford.LEPIDVS•PONT•MAX III•V•R•P•CHead of Marcus Lepidus to right; around, LEPIDVS•PONT•MAX III•V•R•P•C (MA ligatured); border of dotsHead of Octavian to right; around CAESAR•IMP•III•VIR•R•P•C, border of dots
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford says the moneyer is Gaius Publicius Malleolus, quaestor 80. Crawford dates the coin circa 9...
Sydenham states that Octavian is also a moneyer of this coin. He identifies the date as 40 B.C.E. in...
Crawford identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. while Sydenham identifies it as 40 B.C.E.C•CA...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. instead of the date of 43 B.C.E. iidentified ...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 40 B.C.E. instead of the date of 42 B.C.E .identified b...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. instead of the date of 42 B.C.E .identified b...
Crawford considers the date of 38 B.C.E. as uncerrtain; Sydenham dates the coin to 37 B.C.E..CAESAR ...
Crawford considers the date of 38 B.C.E. as uncerrtain; Sydenham dates the coin to 37 B.C.E.DIVI•FDI...
Crawford notes that the absence of the cognomen Caesar and of any of the types used on coins by Iuli...
Sydenham dates this coin to 119-110 B.C.E. He identifies the togate figure on the left as either Luc...
Crawford says Crawford says the moneyer is presumably Aulus Postumius S(p).f. Albinus. Crawford date...
Sydenham dates this coin to 110 B.C.E.ROMAT·CLOVLIHelmeted head of Roma to right; behind, wreath; be...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford says the moneyer is Gaius Publicius Malleolus, quaestor 80. Crawford dates the coin circa 9...
Sydenham states that Octavian is also a moneyer of this coin. He identifies the date as 40 B.C.E. in...
Crawford identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. while Sydenham identifies it as 40 B.C.E.C•CA...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. instead of the date of 43 B.C.E. iidentified ...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 40 B.C.E. instead of the date of 42 B.C.E .identified b...
Sydenham identifies the date of this coin as 41 B.C.E. instead of the date of 42 B.C.E .identified b...
Crawford considers the date of 38 B.C.E. as uncerrtain; Sydenham dates the coin to 37 B.C.E..CAESAR ...
Crawford considers the date of 38 B.C.E. as uncerrtain; Sydenham dates the coin to 37 B.C.E.DIVI•FDI...
Crawford notes that the absence of the cognomen Caesar and of any of the types used on coins by Iuli...
Sydenham dates this coin to 119-110 B.C.E. He identifies the togate figure on the left as either Luc...
Crawford says Crawford says the moneyer is presumably Aulus Postumius S(p).f. Albinus. Crawford date...
Sydenham dates this coin to 110 B.C.E.ROMAT·CLOVLIHelmeted head of Roma to right; behind, wreath; be...
Crawford speculates the moneyer is Quintus Minucius Rufus, legatus 110 and elder brother of the cons...
Crawford suggest the moneyer is perhaps descended from Gaius Aburius. Sydenham identifies this coin ...
Crawford states that the moneyer, Marcus Sergius Silus, is not known to have progressed beyond the q...
Crawford says the moneyer is Gaius Publicius Malleolus, quaestor 80. Crawford dates the coin circa 9...
DOI
Add to ORKG