Crawford notes the date as 206-200 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHelmeted head of Roma to right; behind, value mark (X); border of dotsDioscuri, to right; below, pentagram; in linear frame, ROMA; line borde
Crawford denotes time period as 194-190 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Sydenham notes a date of 106 B.C.E. that is later than the range of 115 - 114 B.C.E. that Crawford i...
Sydenham says this an uncertain issue and notes a date of 100 B.C.E. that is later than the range of...
Crawford notes the date as 206-200 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III – c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 207 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford notes the date as 206-195 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as after 211 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 18...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 209 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford denotes time period as 206-195B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHelm...
Crawford denotes time period as 206-195 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Crawford denotes time period as 211-208 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Crawford denotes time period as 194-190 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Sydenham notes a date of 106 B.C.E. that is later than the range of 115 - 114 B.C.E. that Crawford i...
Sydenham says this an uncertain issue and notes a date of 100 B.C.E. that is later than the range of...
Crawford notes the date as 206-200 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III – c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 207 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford notes the date as 206-195 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as after 211 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 18...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 209 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 209-208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-...
Crawford notes the date as 208 B.C.E., while Sydenham places this series in Period III - c. 187-155 ...
Crawford denotes time period as 206-195B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHelm...
Crawford denotes time period as 206-195 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Crawford denotes time period as 211-208 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Crawford denotes time period as 194-190 B.C.E. Sydenham denotes time period as 187-155 B.C.E.ROMAHel...
Sydenham notes a date of 106 B.C.E. that is later than the range of 115 - 114 B.C.E. that Crawford i...
Sydenham says this an uncertain issue and notes a date of 100 B.C.E. that is later than the range of...
DOI
Add to ORKG