The New Zealand Court of Appeal has rejected evidence of neuroimaging to help juries assess the capacity of the accused in an insanity plea. This chapter says the Court of Appeal was right to do so because neuroimaging should not replace the role of the jury. The chapter explains; that neuroscience will help us better understand how the brain functions and what relationship there is between that functioning and how we make decisions. The chapter concludes that neuroscience will be helpful for insight into the human condition but cannot replace the moral choices of what we think is right or wrong or whether we should be culpable or should not be
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
Insanity is a distinctive element of criminal law because it brings together two very different disc...
The use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal law has been subject to intense and sustained debate...
The New Zealand Court of Appeal has rejected evidence of neuroimaging to help juries assess the capa...
Recent research has detailed the use of neuroscience in several jurisdictions, but Australia remains...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
This chapter considers the claims made on behalf of neuroscience in three areas: legal philosophy, e...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
The use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal trials has been steadily increasing. Despi...
Neuroenthusiasts and neuroskeptics both exaggerate the strength of their positions. Neuroscience is ...
Much of the public debate surrounding the intersection of neuroscience and criminal law is based on ...
This chapter suggests that for conceptual, empirical, and practical reasons, neuroscience in general...
This chapter suggests on conceptual and empirical grounds that at present neuroscience does not have...
Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscienc...
There are different definitions of neurolaw in circulation, but it is essentially an umbrella term f...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
Insanity is a distinctive element of criminal law because it brings together two very different disc...
The use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal law has been subject to intense and sustained debate...
The New Zealand Court of Appeal has rejected evidence of neuroimaging to help juries assess the capa...
Recent research has detailed the use of neuroscience in several jurisdictions, but Australia remains...
Neuroimaging evidence should be restricted in terms of admissibility in the courts, and should only ...
This chapter considers the claims made on behalf of neuroscience in three areas: legal philosophy, e...
Patterson deny that the activities of persons (knowl-edge, rule-following, interpretation) can be un...
The use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal trials has been steadily increasing. Despi...
Neuroenthusiasts and neuroskeptics both exaggerate the strength of their positions. Neuroscience is ...
Much of the public debate surrounding the intersection of neuroscience and criminal law is based on ...
This chapter suggests that for conceptual, empirical, and practical reasons, neuroscience in general...
This chapter suggests on conceptual and empirical grounds that at present neuroscience does not have...
Arguments for the importance of neuroscience reach across many disciplines. Advocates of neuroscienc...
There are different definitions of neurolaw in circulation, but it is essentially an umbrella term f...
In the contemporary debate on the use of the neurosciences in ethics and law, numerous arguments hav...
Insanity is a distinctive element of criminal law because it brings together two very different disc...
The use of neuroscientific evidence in criminal law has been subject to intense and sustained debate...