Social presence and communication quality in videoconferencing

Three-dimensional videoconferencing tools are thought to be less artificial than conventional videoconferencing tools and therefore have the potential to support more complex business tasks. Social Presence serves as a measure of the naturalness of communication. However, a communications media that supports high Social Presence does not imply that the communication process within the media is of a high quality. This research evaluates Social Presence within two videoconferencing setups, a traditional `two-dimensional' interface and a newly emerging `threedimensional' virtual one. An initial study compares these with a face-to-face setup using two existing Social Presence measures and finds one to be sensitive enough to find variations in the Social Presence levels emitted This questionnaire is used in a second study along with items constructed from an extensive literature review to explore communication quality within each interface. A significant difference in the supported Social Presence was found. Initial thoughts on communication quality are also discussed.UnpublishedAliceStreet Ltd. Alicestreet conference center, 2005. Online Resource. Last accessed 19 September 2005 http://www.aiicestreet.com/. C. Basdogan, C. Ho, M. Srinivasan, and M. Slater. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer Human interaction, 7:443-460, 2000. G. Bente. Virtual encounters: Creating social presence in net-based collaborations. Paper submitted for Presence -Workshop, London/UK, 2005. M. Billinghurst. Shared space: Explorations in collaborative augmented reality, 2002. Chapter 4, PhD-Thesis, University of Washington. F. Biocca, C. Harms, and J.Gregg. The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Proceedings of Presence 2001, 2001. J. Bortz and N. Doering. Research Methods and Evaluation for Social Scientists. Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, 1995. 2nd Ed, Title Translated into English. C. Botella, R. Banos, and M. Alcaniz. A psychological approach to presence. Proceedings of Presence 2003, 2003. C. Cornelius and M. Boos. Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computermediated communication by training. Communication Research, 2003. 0. Daly-Jones, A. Monk, and L. Watts. Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus. ACM, 49:21-58, 1998. P. de Greef and W. IJsselsteijn. Social presence in the photoshare tele-application, 2000. Proceedings 3rd International Presence Workshop http://www.presenceresearch.org/papers/socpres.html. J. Donath. Visualizing conversational coherence. MIT Media Lab, 2000. Last accessed 18 July "http://www.visi.com/ snowfall/DA_Donath.pdr G. Gabriel and M. L. Maher. An analysis of design communication with and without computer mediation. Proceedings of Co-Designing, pages 329-337, 2000. D. Grayson and A. Monk. Are you looking at me? eye contact and desktop video conferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10:221-243, 2003. J. Hauber, H. Regenbrecht, A. Hills, A. Cockburn, and M. Billinghurst. Social presence in two- and three-dimensional videoconferencing. Proceedings Presence Workshop London 2005, 2005. P. Hinton, C. Brownlow, I. McMurray, and B. Cozens. SPSS Explained. Routledge, London and New York, 2004. M. Huang and N. Alessi. Presence as an emotional experience. In J. Westwood, H. Hoffamn, R. Robb, and D. Stredney, editors, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: The convergence of Physical and informational Technologies Options for a New Era in Healthcare, pages 148-153, Amsterdam, 1999. TOS Press. Human-Synergistics. Hsi survival simulations, 2005. Viewed 4 May http://www.humansyn.co.uk/products/survivaLinfo.html. 'group Project Consortium. Home page, 2005. Online Resource. Last accessed 21 September 2005 http://www.igroup.org/. W. IJsselsteijn. Presence in the past: What can we learn from media history. In Riva et al. (2003), pages 4-14. W. Ijsselsteijn, J. Freeman, and H. De Ridder. Presence: Where are we? CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 4:179-182, 2001. B. Inkso. Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioural and physiological methods. In Riva et al. (2003), pages 110-118. M. Johnston, L. Pecchioni, and R. Edwards. The influence of interpersonal communication variables on group communication satisfaction. Academy of Managerial Communications, 4:36-54, 2000. IC Lafferty, P.M Eady, and A.W Pond. The Desert Survival Problem; a group decision making experience for examining and increasing individual and team effectiveness. Plymouth/Michigan, Experimental Learning Methods, 1974. D. Lampton, J. Bliss, and C. Morris. Human performance measurement in virtual environments. In Kay M. Stanney, editor, Handbook of Virtual Environments. Design, implementation, and Applications, New Jersey, 2002. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. M. Lombard and T. Ditton. At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. JCMC, 3, 1997. K. Mania and A. Chalmers. Between Real and Unreal: Investigating Presence and Task Performance. In The design of a pilot study, 2000. B. Newberry. Media richness, social presence and technology supported communication activities in education. 2001. Presence-Research. Task performance measures: Transfer, 2005. Viewed 4 May http://www.presence-research.orgl. H. Regenbrecht, T. Luxe, P. Kohler, C. Ott, M. Wagner, W. Wilke, and E. Mueller. Using augmented virtuality for remote collaboration. Presence, 13:338-354, 2004. G. Riva, F. Davide, and W. IJsselsteijn, editors. Being There - Concepts, effects and measurements of user presence in synthetic environments. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003. RogerKnapp. Scouting games, 2005. Last accessed 31 May 2005 www.rogerknapp.com/download/games.htm. W. Sadowski and K. Stanney. Presence in virtual environments, 2005. Available from http://vehand.engr.ucf.edulhandbook/Chapters/Chapter45.html last accessed 19 October. T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht. Embodied presence in virtual environments. In R. Paton and I. Neilson, editors, Visual Representations and Interpretations, pages 268-278, London, 1999. Springer-Verlag. T. Sheridan. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1:120-125, 1992. J. Short, E. Williams, and B. Christie. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Wiley, London, 1976. M. Slater and S. Wilbur. A framework for immersive virtual environments (five):speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6:603-616, 1997. SmartMeeting. Online product description. 2005. Available fromatp://www.sm.artmeeting.com/default.aspx?c---=Features last accessed 12 July. University of Twente. Media Richness Theory. 2004. Available from http://www.tcw.utwente.nl/theorieenoverzicht/Theory%20clusters/Mass20Media/Media_Rich N. Ward and W. Tsukahara. Prosodic features which cue back-channel responses in english and japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32:1177-1207, 2000. E. Williams. Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 84:963-976, 1977. B. Witmer and M. Singer. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7:225-240, 1998