The effects of trade liberalization on productivity and welfare: The role of firm heterogeneity, R&D and market structure

This paper develops an oligopolistic model of international trade with heterogeneous firms and endogenous R&D to examine how trade liberalization affects firm and industry productivity, as well as social welfare. We identify four effects of trade liberalization on productivity: (i) a direct effect through changes in R&D investment; (ii) a scale effect due to changes in firm size; (iii) a selection effect due to inefficient firms leaving the market; and (iv) a market-share reallocation effect as efficient firms expand and inefficient firms reduce their output. We show how these effects operate in the short run when market structure is fixed, and in the long run when market structure is endogenous. Among the robust results that hold for any market structure are that trade liberalization (i) increases (decreases) aggregate R&D for low (high) trade costs; (ii) increases expected firm size if trade costs are high; and (iii) raises expected social welfare if trade costs are low. JEL classification: F12, F15UnpublishedAlvarez, R. and R.A. López (2005). Exporting and performance: evidence fromChilean plants. Canadian Journal of Economics 38, 1384—1400. Amiti, M. and J. Konings (2005), Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. IMF Working Paper 5/146. Atkeson, A. and A. Burstein (2006). Innovation, firm dynamics, and international trade. UCLA, mimeo. Aw, Bee Yan, Roberts, Mark J. and Winston, Tor (2007). Export Market Participation, Investments in R&D and Worker Training, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity. The World Economy 30, 83—104. Baldwin, R.E. (2005). Heterogeneous firms and trade: testable and untestable properties of the Melitz model. Baldwin, R.E. and R. Forslid (2004). Trade liberalisation with heterogeneous firms. CEPR Discussion Paper 4635. Bagwell, K. and R.W. Staiger (1994). The sensitivity of strategic and corrective R&D policy in oligopolistic markets. Journal of International Economics 36, 133—150. Bernard, A.B. and J.B. Jensen (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics 47, 1—25 Bernard, A.B., J. Eaton, J.B. Jensen and S. Kortum (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 93, 1268—1290. Brander, J.A. and P.R. Krugman (1983). A reciprocal dumping model of international trade. Journal of International Economics 15, 313—323. Cox, D. and R. Harris (1985). Trade liberalization and industrial organization: Some estimates for Canada. Journal of Political Economy 93, 115—145. Cramton, P.C. and T.R. Palfrey (1990). Cartel enforcement with uncertainty about cost. International Economic Review 31, 17—47. Ederington, J. and P. McCalman (2007). The impact of trade liberalization on productivity within and across industries: Theory and evidence. University of Kentucky, mimeo. Emami Namini, J. and R.A. Lopez (2006). Random versus conscious selection into export markets: theory and empirical evidence. Indiana University, mimeo. Fernandes, A. (2007). Trade policy, trade volumes and plant-level productivity in Colombian manufacturing industries. Journal of International Economics 71, 52—71. Funk,M. (2003). The effects of trade on research and development. Open Economies Review 14 , 29—42. Greenaway, D.,and R. Kneller, (2005). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment: A Survey. Leverhulme Centre Research Paper 2005/32, University of Nottingham. Gustafsson, P. and P. Segerstrom (2006). Trade liberalization and productivity growth. Stockholm School of Economics, mimeo. Haaland, J. and H. Kind (2004). R&D policies, trade and process innovation. CEPR Working Paper 4784. Hallward-Driermeier, M., G. Iarossi and K.L. Sokoloff (2002). Exports and manufacturing productivity in East Asia: A comparative analysis with firm-level data. NBER Working Paper 8894. Head, K. and J. Ries (1999). Rationalization effects of tariff reductions. Journal of International Economics 47, 295—320. Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz and S.R. Yeaple (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94, 300—316. Konings, J. and H. Vandenbussche (2004). Antidumping protection and productivity growth of domestic firms. CEPR Discussion Paper 4620. Melitz, M.J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71, 1695-1725. Melitz, M.J. and G.I.P. Ottaviano (2004). Market size, trade, and productivity. mimeo. Miyagiwa, K. and Y. Ohno (1995). Closing the technology gap under protection. American Economic Review 85, 755—770. Muendler, M.A. (2004), Trade, technology, and productivity: A study of Brazilian manufacturers, 1986—1998. UC San Diego, mimeo. Navas, A. and D. Sala (2006), Process innovation and the selection effect of trade, mimeo. Pavcnik, N. (2002), Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. Review of Economic Studies 69, 245—276. Rodrik, D. (1992). Closing technology gaps: does trade liberalization really help?. in: G. Helleiner (ed.), Trade Policy, Industrialization and Development: New Perspectives. Claredon Press. Trefler, D. (2004). The long and the short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. American Economic Review 94, 870—895. Tybout, J. (2003). Plant- and firm-level evidence on “New” Trade Theories, in E.K Choi and J. Harrigan (eds.): Handbook of International Trade. Blackwell, Oxford. Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: A survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy 30, 60—82