The processes and protocols for mentoring inexperienced peer reviewers is an important topic if the scientific community is to maintain high standards for empirical work. A review of the literature, interviews, and personal experience as a mentee revealed a variety of different protocols and procedures. This paper highlights the current state of the peer review process from the empirical literature, interviews, and personal experience. Results indicate that there are no established, evidence-based, protocols for training new peer reviewers
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, y...
The quality assurance of research articles is based on a widespread reliance on peer review, which h...
In discipline-specific writing courses, students develop professional skills in reading, writing, an...
The processes and protocols for mentoring inexperienced peer reviewers is an important topic if the ...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
There is very little written regarding developing the skills of doing peer reviews. In this piece we...
Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality science, but very litt...
In recent years it has become quite common to use a routine research practice within our classrooms:...
Despite the popularity of peer assessment (PA), gaps in the literature make it difficult to describe...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
The iterative process of writing and the benefits of peer review are often overlooked in undergradua...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, ...
Peer reviewers serve a vital role in assessing the value of published scholarship and improving the ...
This research paper explores the processes and outcomes of a peer review system which was introduced...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, y...
The quality assurance of research articles is based on a widespread reliance on peer review, which h...
In discipline-specific writing courses, students develop professional skills in reading, writing, an...
The processes and protocols for mentoring inexperienced peer reviewers is an important topic if the ...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
There is very little written regarding developing the skills of doing peer reviews. In this piece we...
Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality science, but very litt...
In recent years it has become quite common to use a routine research practice within our classrooms:...
Despite the popularity of peer assessment (PA), gaps in the literature make it difficult to describe...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
The iterative process of writing and the benefits of peer review are often overlooked in undergradua...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, ...
Peer reviewers serve a vital role in assessing the value of published scholarship and improving the ...
This research paper explores the processes and outcomes of a peer review system which was introduced...
Peer reviewers plays a crucial for scientific journals today. The review process is a critical view ...
Objective: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality research, y...
The quality assurance of research articles is based on a widespread reliance on peer review, which h...
In discipline-specific writing courses, students develop professional skills in reading, writing, an...