In evaluating potential abuses in the creation and operation of service corporations, the courts have been unable to define the proper roles of assignment of income principles and section 482, both of which may under certain conditions require the taxation of such corporations\u27 employee-shareholders, and section 351, which shields certain transfers of income to the corporation. The author, after an analysis of case law and rulings that deal with service and other closely held corporations, proposes a framework in which to harmonize the policies of sections 482 and 351 in light of the assignment of income doctrine
Several issues impact the management of accounting for large not-for-profit organizations that would...
In Putoma Corp. the Tax Court decided that foregiveness of interest indebtedness owed by a corporati...
This article discusses C.I.R. v. Fender Sales, Inc., 338 F. 2d 924 (9th Cir. 1964). The author concl...
Whether income earned by an incorporated personal service business is taxable to the individual or t...
This article will analyze the proper application of the assignment of income doctrine to personal se...
In the context of a European project describing variations in the structure of the corporate income ...
When professionals and other persons who offer their goods and/or services to the public conduct the...
Section 356(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue. Code requires the recipient of boot in a corporate reorga...
X contracted with a corporation controlled by him for the manufacture of machines on which he held p...
The Supreme Court developed the assignment of income doctrine to solve the question of who the prope...
The corporate division, however, lends itself to schemes for avoidance of tax. These schemes are att...
This Article traces the development of the nonentity and agency approaches to the treatment of nomin...
The dividends paid deduction provided for in section 561 of the Internal Revenue Code is of vital im...
The Courts of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits are in conflict on the question of whether se...
Tax-Fogelsong IV: THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT A PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORATION AND ITS SOLE SHAREHO...
Several issues impact the management of accounting for large not-for-profit organizations that would...
In Putoma Corp. the Tax Court decided that foregiveness of interest indebtedness owed by a corporati...
This article discusses C.I.R. v. Fender Sales, Inc., 338 F. 2d 924 (9th Cir. 1964). The author concl...
Whether income earned by an incorporated personal service business is taxable to the individual or t...
This article will analyze the proper application of the assignment of income doctrine to personal se...
In the context of a European project describing variations in the structure of the corporate income ...
When professionals and other persons who offer their goods and/or services to the public conduct the...
Section 356(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue. Code requires the recipient of boot in a corporate reorga...
X contracted with a corporation controlled by him for the manufacture of machines on which he held p...
The Supreme Court developed the assignment of income doctrine to solve the question of who the prope...
The corporate division, however, lends itself to schemes for avoidance of tax. These schemes are att...
This Article traces the development of the nonentity and agency approaches to the treatment of nomin...
The dividends paid deduction provided for in section 561 of the Internal Revenue Code is of vital im...
The Courts of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits are in conflict on the question of whether se...
Tax-Fogelsong IV: THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT A PERSONAL SERVICE CORPORATION AND ITS SOLE SHAREHO...
Several issues impact the management of accounting for large not-for-profit organizations that would...
In Putoma Corp. the Tax Court decided that foregiveness of interest indebtedness owed by a corporati...
This article discusses C.I.R. v. Fender Sales, Inc., 338 F. 2d 924 (9th Cir. 1964). The author concl...