Add to ORKGIn light of society\u27s increasing reliance on technology, this article explores a critical question – that of the Fourth Amendment’s protection over privacy in the digital age. Specifically, this article addresses how the law currently fails to protect the privacy of one’s cell phone records and its ramifications. By highlighting the antiquated precedent leading up to the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling in United States v. Davis, this article calls on the judiciary to find a more appropriate balance for protecting the right to privacy in a modern society
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
Only a small fraction of law enforcement agencies in the United States obtain a warrant before track...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
This past June, the Supreme Court decided the case Carpenter v. United States, which some may call o...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
This Note argues that the “specific and articulable facts” standard does not accord with the intent ...
Can the Fourth Amendment protect an individual’s right privacy by preventing the disclosure of her l...
Since the 1800s, the United States Supreme Court has struggled to define the limits of the Fourth Am...
With the help of technological advancements, law enforcement can now hijack a targeted individual’s ...
The rights secured to us by the Fourth Amendment were the driving force behind the American Revoluti...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
Only a small fraction of law enforcement agencies in the United States obtain a warrant before track...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...
This past June, the Supreme Court decided the case Carpenter v. United States, which some may call o...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
This Note argues that the “specific and articulable facts” standard does not accord with the intent ...
Can the Fourth Amendment protect an individual’s right privacy by preventing the disclosure of her l...
Since the 1800s, the United States Supreme Court has struggled to define the limits of the Fourth Am...
With the help of technological advancements, law enforcement can now hijack a targeted individual’s ...
The rights secured to us by the Fourth Amendment were the driving force behind the American Revoluti...
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carpenter v United States, a case that offers the Court anot...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
Only a small fraction of law enforcement agencies in the United States obtain a warrant before track...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court will decide whether the government’s acquisition of...