This article deals with the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to require permits under the Rivers and Harbors Act for dredge and fill activities. The author argues that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reached the correct result via a new analytic approach, and in the process extended the corps\u27jurisdiction shoreward of the mean high tide line, to include all activities, without regard to location, which affect the course, condition, or capacity of navigable waters
On August 28, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineer...
This article will examine the two decisional approaches that the Richardson Court considered in supp...
There is no particular policy reason why the same line should be used for both the upland boundary o...
This article deals with the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to require per...
Federal Jurisdiction- WATER POLLUTION CONTROL- FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 197...
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court, in United States v. Rands, expanded the navigational servitude doct...
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/umpress_tidal_wetlands_primer_images/1068/thumbnail.jp
Several states have recently enacted legislation regulating dredge and fill operations in certain cl...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
Administrative Law- JUDICIAL REVIEW- REPORTS OF STATE AGENCIES CONSTITUTE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVID...
This article examines what has been a troublesome area of admiralty law for Florida courts and pract...
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Walton County v. Stop the Beach Renourishm...
It is black letter constitutional theory that the several states are the masters of their property l...
This article first discusses the facts of the Walton County case and how the statute affects title t...
Real Property- DOCTRINE OF CUSTOMARY RIGHTS- CUSTOMARY PUBLIC USE OF PRIVATELY OWNED BEACH PRECLUDES...
On August 28, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineer...
This article will examine the two decisional approaches that the Richardson Court considered in supp...
There is no particular policy reason why the same line should be used for both the upland boundary o...
This article deals with the jurisdiction of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to require per...
Federal Jurisdiction- WATER POLLUTION CONTROL- FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS OF 197...
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court, in United States v. Rands, expanded the navigational servitude doct...
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/umpress_tidal_wetlands_primer_images/1068/thumbnail.jp
Several states have recently enacted legislation regulating dredge and fill operations in certain cl...
When landowners seek to determine if a permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers to discha...
Administrative Law- JUDICIAL REVIEW- REPORTS OF STATE AGENCIES CONSTITUTE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVID...
This article examines what has been a troublesome area of admiralty law for Florida courts and pract...
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Walton County v. Stop the Beach Renourishm...
It is black letter constitutional theory that the several states are the masters of their property l...
This article first discusses the facts of the Walton County case and how the statute affects title t...
Real Property- DOCTRINE OF CUSTOMARY RIGHTS- CUSTOMARY PUBLIC USE OF PRIVATELY OWNED BEACH PRECLUDES...
On August 28, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineer...
This article will examine the two decisional approaches that the Richardson Court considered in supp...
There is no particular policy reason why the same line should be used for both the upland boundary o...