Add to ORKGIn Hampton v. United States the Supreme Court held that the defense of entrapment is not available to a defendant who procured contraband from a government agent if the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime. In this article the history of the defense of entrapment and the reasoning of the divided court in deciding the Hampton case are examined in detail. The author concludes that the rule set by the Hampton case encourages violation of defendants\u27 rights by police, and that legislative reform may be necessary
The federal law of procedure in entrapment cases is in profound disarray. Despite four attempts over...
This article contrasts the different approaches to dealing with entrapment: the due process rubric o...
This Note will explore the history of the entrapment defense. In addition, this Note will review pre...
In Hampton v. United States the Supreme Court held that the defense of entrapment is not available t...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
In Jacobson v. United States, the Supreme Court narrowed the types of evidence that the prosecution ...
This Note will explore the history of the entrapment defense. In addition, this Note will review pre...
Certain types of criminal activity are consensual and covert. Hence they are virtually undetectable ...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
Since 1932, the defense of entrapment has been firmly established in the federal courts; however, th...
Paul Marcus has produced an extremely thorough article on the intriguing and complex defense of entr...
The issue of entrapment arises initially as a defense when a person is accused of committing a crimi...
The federal law of procedure in entrapment cases is in profound disarray. Despite four attempts over...
This article contrasts the different approaches to dealing with entrapment: the due process rubric o...
This Note will explore the history of the entrapment defense. In addition, this Note will review pre...
In Hampton v. United States the Supreme Court held that the defense of entrapment is not available t...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
In Jacobson v. United States, the Supreme Court narrowed the types of evidence that the prosecution ...
This Note will explore the history of the entrapment defense. In addition, this Note will review pre...
Certain types of criminal activity are consensual and covert. Hence they are virtually undetectable ...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
The task of this Article is to assess the competing approaches that circuit courts have taken in def...
Since 1932, the defense of entrapment has been firmly established in the federal courts; however, th...
Paul Marcus has produced an extremely thorough article on the intriguing and complex defense of entr...
The issue of entrapment arises initially as a defense when a person is accused of committing a crimi...
The federal law of procedure in entrapment cases is in profound disarray. Despite four attempts over...
This article contrasts the different approaches to dealing with entrapment: the due process rubric o...
This Note will explore the history of the entrapment defense. In addition, this Note will review pre...