Add to ORKGIn a recent decision the Supreme Court held that a private employer\u27s disability benefits plan which excluded pregnancy benefits was not discriminatory under Title VII. Although purporting to apply traditional Title VII standards, the Court in fact used an equal protection analysis. The author criticizes this approach and points out the Court\u27s failure to consider facts critical to a comprehensive analysis of the issue
Pregnant women sometimes ask employers for accommodations – such as being able to sit on a stool or ...
Sherry O’Steen was caught in a constitutional transition. Abandoned by her husband during her unexpe...
Several employment discrimination decisions were handed down this Term. They were Ricci v.DeStefano ...
In a recent decision the Supreme Court held that a private employer\u27s disability benefits plan wh...
The U.S. Supreme Court, in General Electric v. Gilbert, held that the exclusion of pregnancy benefit...
In its recent decision Hall v. Nalco, the Seventh Circuit became the first Federal Circuit Court of ...
Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual, 511 F.2d 199 (3d Cir.), cert. granted 95 S.Ct. 1989 (1975).* Illness and d...
Prior to 1971 women found little relief in the courts for claims of sex discrimination. The Supreme ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 pro...
A general survey of the state of the law at all points where maternity produces a claim of sex discr...
Pregnancy — a health condition that only affects women — raises complicated questions regarding the ...
Historically, discrimination against women concerning childbirth and pregnancy was legally sanctione...
In Geduldig v. Aielo, the United States Supreme Court held that California\u27s refusal to insure no...
In a resounding victory for women\u27s and workers\u27 rights, the U.S. Supreme Court has found that...
This project focuses on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and its role in the history of equa...
Pregnant women sometimes ask employers for accommodations – such as being able to sit on a stool or ...
Sherry O’Steen was caught in a constitutional transition. Abandoned by her husband during her unexpe...
Several employment discrimination decisions were handed down this Term. They were Ricci v.DeStefano ...
In a recent decision the Supreme Court held that a private employer\u27s disability benefits plan wh...
The U.S. Supreme Court, in General Electric v. Gilbert, held that the exclusion of pregnancy benefit...
In its recent decision Hall v. Nalco, the Seventh Circuit became the first Federal Circuit Court of ...
Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual, 511 F.2d 199 (3d Cir.), cert. granted 95 S.Ct. 1989 (1975).* Illness and d...
Prior to 1971 women found little relief in the courts for claims of sex discrimination. The Supreme ...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 pro...
A general survey of the state of the law at all points where maternity produces a claim of sex discr...
Pregnancy — a health condition that only affects women — raises complicated questions regarding the ...
Historically, discrimination against women concerning childbirth and pregnancy was legally sanctione...
In Geduldig v. Aielo, the United States Supreme Court held that California\u27s refusal to insure no...
In a resounding victory for women\u27s and workers\u27 rights, the U.S. Supreme Court has found that...
This project focuses on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and its role in the history of equa...
Pregnant women sometimes ask employers for accommodations – such as being able to sit on a stool or ...
Sherry O’Steen was caught in a constitutional transition. Abandoned by her husband during her unexpe...
Several employment discrimination decisions were handed down this Term. They were Ricci v.DeStefano ...