Add to ORKGThe authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distinctions between the three theories of recovery in products liability actions, negligence, implied warranty and strict liability, are clarified through close and detailed analysis. The authors prefer strict liability to the other two causes of action because of its lessened burden of proof on plaintiffs and its less intricate analysis. The examination of case law, however, leads the authors to conclude that the courts are often applying the strict liability doctrine incorrectly
The primary emphasis of this article will be on the application of proximate cause in strict liabili...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Since the doctrine of caveat emptor gave way to a more enlightened response, the courts have struggl...
The authors consider the question of whether warranty law in Maryland now provides the plaintiff in ...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
The Uniform Comparative Fault Act, drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform St...
Many manufacturers and insurance companies claim that a products liability crisis exists. This is ev...
Dean Prosser, in his celebrated article, The Assault Upon the Citadel, compared the assault on warra...
This paper explores the concept of causative fault – with an emphasis on proximate and actual caus...
In the past two decades there has been an explosion of product liability lawsuitsbrought against man...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
The primary emphasis of this article will be on the application of proximate cause in strict liabili...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...
The authors discuss recent developments in Florida law in the area of products liability. The distin...
Since the doctrine of caveat emptor gave way to a more enlightened response, the courts have struggl...
The authors consider the question of whether warranty law in Maryland now provides the plaintiff in ...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
Since World War H, revolutionary changes have overtaken the American law of products liability. Such...
The Uniform Comparative Fault Act, drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform St...
Many manufacturers and insurance companies claim that a products liability crisis exists. This is ev...
Dean Prosser, in his celebrated article, The Assault Upon the Citadel, compared the assault on warra...
This paper explores the concept of causative fault – with an emphasis on proximate and actual caus...
In the past two decades there has been an explosion of product liability lawsuitsbrought against man...
This article will briefly review the traditional principles of corporate law governing the assumptio...
The primary emphasis of this article will be on the application of proximate cause in strict liabili...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
This article examines the relationship between two concepts found throughout the law of products lia...