In this Article, I will consider two aspects of the controversy that help explain why it is static. I will consider the significance of empirical evidence that lawyers and clients find the rules morally troubling. Zacharias plausibly assumes that such evidence carries compelling weight. I will also look at the nature of morality itself and the extent to which professional rules should be expected to conform to morality
Attorney-client confidentiality doctrine is distinguished by its expansiveness and its rigid or cate...
Modem American lawyers impose on one another regulatory rules that speak to the old argument but hav...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...
The proper limits to attorney-client confidentiality are hotly debated by lawyers and legal scholars...
The Model Rules currently contain at least four distinct conceptions of what it means for a lawyer t...
Journal ArticleThe Model Rules of Professional Conduct proposed by the American Bar Association diff...
Fred Zacharias\u27s articles, Rethinking Confidentiality, published in two parts, were a sensational...
This Article might lead one to ask which body better apprehended the nature of the prosecutorial dis...
Many core questions in legal ethics concern the relationship between ordinary morality and rules of ...
This Article offers an alternative dialogue approach. Rather than view the issue of explaining confi...
Much of the anxiety and dissatisfaction associated with legal ethics arises from the categorical qua...
Drawing on Jacques Maritain\u27s doctrine of Knowledge through Connaturality, and on other authors i...
Journal ArticleA peaceful society depends on the high ethical standards of its lawyers: Communal tru...
Analyzing Rule 1.6 of the Model Rules from a Jewish perspective can help solve some of the conflicts...
The article addresses a common question: What should the rules require lawyers to do when they recei...
Attorney-client confidentiality doctrine is distinguished by its expansiveness and its rigid or cate...
Modem American lawyers impose on one another regulatory rules that speak to the old argument but hav...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...
The proper limits to attorney-client confidentiality are hotly debated by lawyers and legal scholars...
The Model Rules currently contain at least four distinct conceptions of what it means for a lawyer t...
Journal ArticleThe Model Rules of Professional Conduct proposed by the American Bar Association diff...
Fred Zacharias\u27s articles, Rethinking Confidentiality, published in two parts, were a sensational...
This Article might lead one to ask which body better apprehended the nature of the prosecutorial dis...
Many core questions in legal ethics concern the relationship between ordinary morality and rules of ...
This Article offers an alternative dialogue approach. Rather than view the issue of explaining confi...
Much of the anxiety and dissatisfaction associated with legal ethics arises from the categorical qua...
Drawing on Jacques Maritain\u27s doctrine of Knowledge through Connaturality, and on other authors i...
Journal ArticleA peaceful society depends on the high ethical standards of its lawyers: Communal tru...
Analyzing Rule 1.6 of the Model Rules from a Jewish perspective can help solve some of the conflicts...
The article addresses a common question: What should the rules require lawyers to do when they recei...
Attorney-client confidentiality doctrine is distinguished by its expansiveness and its rigid or cate...
Modem American lawyers impose on one another regulatory rules that speak to the old argument but hav...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...