The purpose of this Comment is to examine the three congressional acts relating to air, water and noise pollution and their legislative history in an attempt to determine the mandated scope of federal agency compliance with local pollution regulations. In view of the fact that the Clean Air Act provision relating to control of pollution from federal facilities was the first such provision and apparently the prototype of the provisions on the noise and water pollution control acts, major emphasis will be placed on it. It is the author\u27s belief that: (1) the complementary nature of the three acts and the almost identical wording of the provisions contained therein mandate uniform interpretation of the three provisions; and (2) correctly in...
Renewed interest in an expanded role for water quality standards in the regulatory scheme has develo...
Air pollution is clearly one of the major social problems confronting contemporary American society....
The purpose of this article is to analyze the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Train v. Natural Resour...
Local governments have recently expanded their efforts to abate pollution problems. The constitution...
Air pollution poses a problem not only to our environment, but also to our jurisdictional structure....
This Comment deals with two issues relating to the controversy in San Diego County over gasoline vap...
In 1972 the Supreme Court in Illinois v. City of Milwaukee established the federal common law of pub...
This Comment critiques the EPA\u27s use of its discretionary power in enforcing water pollution prob...
This comment explores whether Congress went too far in its effort to guide the states in the control...
EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA illustrates the difficulty the EPA faces as it attempts to fo...
Much has changed with regard to air pollution control since 1970 whenCongress revised the Clean Air ...
Two elements of the Clean Air Act are viewed as essential to its many successes: the health-based na...
The Clean Air Act promotes cleaner air, but for whom? Although the Clean Air Act has lowered levels...
The law has been concerned with air pollution for centuries. Smoke and fumes were considered a nuisa...
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the primary federal statute regulating the emission of air pollutants. Fi...
Renewed interest in an expanded role for water quality standards in the regulatory scheme has develo...
Air pollution is clearly one of the major social problems confronting contemporary American society....
The purpose of this article is to analyze the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Train v. Natural Resour...
Local governments have recently expanded their efforts to abate pollution problems. The constitution...
Air pollution poses a problem not only to our environment, but also to our jurisdictional structure....
This Comment deals with two issues relating to the controversy in San Diego County over gasoline vap...
In 1972 the Supreme Court in Illinois v. City of Milwaukee established the federal common law of pub...
This Comment critiques the EPA\u27s use of its discretionary power in enforcing water pollution prob...
This comment explores whether Congress went too far in its effort to guide the states in the control...
EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA illustrates the difficulty the EPA faces as it attempts to fo...
Much has changed with regard to air pollution control since 1970 whenCongress revised the Clean Air ...
Two elements of the Clean Air Act are viewed as essential to its many successes: the health-based na...
The Clean Air Act promotes cleaner air, but for whom? Although the Clean Air Act has lowered levels...
The law has been concerned with air pollution for centuries. Smoke and fumes were considered a nuisa...
The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the primary federal statute regulating the emission of air pollutants. Fi...
Renewed interest in an expanded role for water quality standards in the regulatory scheme has develo...
Air pollution is clearly one of the major social problems confronting contemporary American society....
The purpose of this article is to analyze the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Train v. Natural Resour...