This Comment examines the status of a California landlord\u27s duty to provide security measures for his tenant. The author analyzes and critiques recent appellate court decisions that have required prior criminal conduct on the premises as a prerequisite to holding a landlord liable in tort for criminal acts. The author argues that the focus of inquiry should be on whether the landlord has been reasonable in providing protective measures and further argues that certain minimum safety requirements should be legislatively enacted
Crime-free housing ordinances allow municipalities to force private landlords to evict tenants who h...
In United States tort law, there are two general approaches to determining when a property owner is ...
The California Supreme Court has stated that the proper test to be applied to the liability of a pos...
In Green v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that a warranty of habitability is im...
When do a landowners owe a duty to protect an individual on their property from the criminal acts of...
This article discusses a California case which held that a landlord has a duty to take minimally bur...
A landlord\u27s potential liability for crimes committed by third parties against tenants has been a...
Until approximately fifteen years ago a landlord was never held civilly liable to his tenants for in...
This Article examines the California Supreme Court\u27s decision in Becker v. IRM Corp., in which it...
This article discusses a California case which held an assault victim had failed to prove that lack ...
In recent decisions,\u27 Florida courts have allowed tenants to recover damages from landlords resul...
This article discusses a California case where the landlord was held liable for property damage ...
The world abounds with laws, and teems with crimes, a statement made in 1775, applies with equal fo...
This Comment examines the United States Supreme Court\u27s statement in The Department of Housing an...
The controversial subject of landlord liability for crimes committed by third parties on the apartme...
Crime-free housing ordinances allow municipalities to force private landlords to evict tenants who h...
In United States tort law, there are two general approaches to determining when a property owner is ...
The California Supreme Court has stated that the proper test to be applied to the liability of a pos...
In Green v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that a warranty of habitability is im...
When do a landowners owe a duty to protect an individual on their property from the criminal acts of...
This article discusses a California case which held that a landlord has a duty to take minimally bur...
A landlord\u27s potential liability for crimes committed by third parties against tenants has been a...
Until approximately fifteen years ago a landlord was never held civilly liable to his tenants for in...
This Article examines the California Supreme Court\u27s decision in Becker v. IRM Corp., in which it...
This article discusses a California case which held an assault victim had failed to prove that lack ...
In recent decisions,\u27 Florida courts have allowed tenants to recover damages from landlords resul...
This article discusses a California case where the landlord was held liable for property damage ...
The world abounds with laws, and teems with crimes, a statement made in 1775, applies with equal fo...
This Comment examines the United States Supreme Court\u27s statement in The Department of Housing an...
The controversial subject of landlord liability for crimes committed by third parties on the apartme...
Crime-free housing ordinances allow municipalities to force private landlords to evict tenants who h...
In United States tort law, there are two general approaches to determining when a property owner is ...
The California Supreme Court has stated that the proper test to be applied to the liability of a pos...