This Article examines the competing claims surrounding the refusal of the U.S. and other industrialized nations to sign the Convention. The author argues that it is now possible that seabed mining will proceed under a reciprocating state regime based on unilateral legislation, justified under the principle of the freedom of the seas. However, the signatory States have claimed that this type of legislation is contrary to international law based on the principle of the common heritage of mankind. The author examines the basis for each of these claims and how these claim survive under the current legal regime governing seabed mining
This essay reflects on what has happened to the principle of the common heritage of humankind (the C...
A key objective of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as stated in its Pre...
Presently, no international law exists to limit recovering mineral sources of the seabed beyond coas...
This Article reviews the positions currently articulated by the United States with respect to UNCLOS...
This thesis argues that international law has failed to address the unique jurisdictional and logist...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
In 1982 the USA and other major industrial states refused to sign the Convention on the Law of the S...
This issue contains timely and relevant articles on each of these important subjects - three article...
In this Article, the author analyzes the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The a...
This Article examines the conditions creating a need for, and the procedures being implemented to ac...
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a major achievement of diplomac...
This Article attempts to outline the events leading up to the submission of Part I of the Informal S...
In December 1970, with no dissenting votes, the United Nations General Assembly declared that the re...
This essay reflects on what has happened to the principle of the common heritage of humankind (the C...
A key objective of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as stated in its Pre...
Presently, no international law exists to limit recovering mineral sources of the seabed beyond coas...
This Article reviews the positions currently articulated by the United States with respect to UNCLOS...
This thesis argues that international law has failed to address the unique jurisdictional and logist...
The author looks at coastal and other state interests competing in the united States\u27 policy for ...
The author reviews negotiations at The Law of the Sea Conference, offering his views as to the sourc...
This Comment critiques the United States\u27 refusal to sign the Convention, based on its contention...
In 1982 the USA and other major industrial states refused to sign the Convention on the Law of the S...
This issue contains timely and relevant articles on each of these important subjects - three article...
In this Article, the author analyzes the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The a...
This Article examines the conditions creating a need for, and the procedures being implemented to ac...
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is a major achievement of diplomac...
This Article attempts to outline the events leading up to the submission of Part I of the Informal S...
In December 1970, with no dissenting votes, the United Nations General Assembly declared that the re...
This essay reflects on what has happened to the principle of the common heritage of humankind (the C...
A key objective of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as stated in its Pre...
Presently, no international law exists to limit recovering mineral sources of the seabed beyond coas...