Add to ORKGThis Comment examines the effects of the tort reform provisions of the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act of 1975 (MICRA). The author argues that MICRA divests medical malpractice victims of the traditional protections governing personal injury litigation, while granting broad immunity to negligent health care providers. The author examines the discriminatory effects created by MICRA and argues that its sweeping tort reforms undermine California\u27s policy of fault-based liability. The author concludes by calling on the California legislature to amend MICRA and provides several suggestions for revision
In recent years there has been a growing concern with what has come to be called in California a med...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
This Comment addresses the impact of California\u27s new Medi-Cal payment system, selective provider...
This Article considers whether state damages caps are constitutional and examines recent studies sug...
This Comment examines the issue of liability of third party health care payors in light of the decis...
The recent rapid rise in medical malpractice insurance rates has engendered a proliferation of state...
The recent rapid rise in medical malpractice insurance rates has engendered a proliferation of state...
This article explores the key issues involved in the attempts at reform of the present medical malpr...
The medical malpractice insurance system experienced a period of crisis in the early 1970s. High jur...
The current “medical malpractice crisis” can be solved by examining and solving the several factors ...
The medical malpractice insurance system experienced a period of crisis in the early 1970s. High jur...
The medical liability environment during the first few years of the 21st Century has been frequently...
This Comment begins with an overview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
In recent years there has been a growing concern with what has come to be called in California a med...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
This Comment addresses the impact of California\u27s new Medi-Cal payment system, selective provider...
This Article considers whether state damages caps are constitutional and examines recent studies sug...
This Comment examines the issue of liability of third party health care payors in light of the decis...
The recent rapid rise in medical malpractice insurance rates has engendered a proliferation of state...
The recent rapid rise in medical malpractice insurance rates has engendered a proliferation of state...
This article explores the key issues involved in the attempts at reform of the present medical malpr...
The medical malpractice insurance system experienced a period of crisis in the early 1970s. High jur...
The current “medical malpractice crisis” can be solved by examining and solving the several factors ...
The medical malpractice insurance system experienced a period of crisis in the early 1970s. High jur...
The medical liability environment during the first few years of the 21st Century has been frequently...
This Comment begins with an overview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the ...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
In recent years there has been a growing concern with what has come to be called in California a med...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...
In Wickline, the California Court of Appeals indicated that the physician\u27s standard of care is u...