Add to ORKGIn this Article, Professor Rabin discusses reflections on law reform and the tort system that arose out of his involvement with the ABA Action Commission to Improve the Tort Liability System. Specifically, he examines the historical antecedents to the present tort reform movement and discusses the goals that tort reform might be taken to serve, the data on system performance, and the strategies for addressing some of the perceived malfunctions
In this Essay, Professor Matsuda argues that the narrow dyadic focus of tort law perpetuates very re...
In 1986 a number of prominent legal scholars embarked upon a project commissioned by the American La...
In attempting to distinguish the 1950s and 1960s tort expansion from the current tort retraction, th...
In this Article, the author argues that tort law generates more perverse behavior than safety and th...
In this Article, the authors support Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposals, but argue that these...
In this Article, the author critiques Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposal. While agreeing with ...
News release announces that Robert L. Rabin will speak on The Politics of Tort Reform at the Unive...
In 1986 a number of prominent legal scholars embarked upon a project commissioned by the American La...
For over thirty years, repeat players on the defense side of tort litigation have undertaken to ref...
This author presents an additional critique of Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposal. The author ...
It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that, as a political matter, the modern tort reform movement...
The two goals of tort law are to compensate victims and to deter unsafe behavior. This paper judges ...
The thesis of the Article is that the expansion of tort liability based on strict liability or enter...
This Symposium convenes at an important moment in the history of modern tort reform. The helpful leg...
This brief Rejoinder addresses two levels of issues: broad questions involved in the effort to estab...
In this Essay, Professor Matsuda argues that the narrow dyadic focus of tort law perpetuates very re...
In 1986 a number of prominent legal scholars embarked upon a project commissioned by the American La...
In attempting to distinguish the 1950s and 1960s tort expansion from the current tort retraction, th...
In this Article, the author argues that tort law generates more perverse behavior than safety and th...
In this Article, the authors support Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposals, but argue that these...
In this Article, the author critiques Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposal. While agreeing with ...
News release announces that Robert L. Rabin will speak on The Politics of Tort Reform at the Unive...
In 1986 a number of prominent legal scholars embarked upon a project commissioned by the American La...
For over thirty years, repeat players on the defense side of tort litigation have undertaken to ref...
This author presents an additional critique of Prof. Sugarman\u27s tort reform proposal. The author ...
It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that, as a political matter, the modern tort reform movement...
The two goals of tort law are to compensate victims and to deter unsafe behavior. This paper judges ...
The thesis of the Article is that the expansion of tort liability based on strict liability or enter...
This Symposium convenes at an important moment in the history of modern tort reform. The helpful leg...
This brief Rejoinder addresses two levels of issues: broad questions involved in the effort to estab...
In this Essay, Professor Matsuda argues that the narrow dyadic focus of tort law perpetuates very re...
In 1986 a number of prominent legal scholars embarked upon a project commissioned by the American La...
In attempting to distinguish the 1950s and 1960s tort expansion from the current tort retraction, th...