Invocation of an evidentiary privilege traditionally meant that the confidential communications of a holder were protected from disclosure during judicial, administrative, or legislative proceedings. This model of evidentiary privilege law does not take into account information gathered from unauthorized preproceeding disclosures of otherwise privileged communications. A minority of courts seem willing to exclude this derivative evidence with little or no explanation. These courts may unwittingly base their decision on privacy concepts recently proposed as one of the modern justifications for the existence of evidentiary privilege in law. Courts confronted with this issue analyze it in confusingly, and often contrastingly, different manners
In furtherance of the national interest in an informed populace, the American press has evolved into...
This Comment focuses on the confidential communication privileges recognized under federal and Virgi...
The giving of admissible evidence of opinion by experts and the concept of ‘litigation privilege’ ea...
Within certain limitations, the law immunizes confidential communications made to an attorney, spous...
In May 2009, a bare majority of the Supreme Court of North Carolina decided State v. Rollins, making...
In the conduct of their affairs the various executive departments and administrative agencies acquir...
In the conduct of their affairs the various executive departments and administrative agencies acquir...
Recent incidents of newsmen being imprisoned for refusing to disclose confidential news sources befo...
This article examines all aspects of proposed federal rules of evidence affecting marital privilege ...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
In civil litigation courts often deal with information that is subject to a previously imposed restr...
Frequently in litigation in the federal courts, discovery of papers, documents and the like in the p...
This comment first examines the recent cases in which a libel plaintiff was impeded by the use of a ...
xii, 367 leaves :ill. (some col.) ; 30cm Includes bibliographical references. "25 October 2006". Uni...
One of the rules most frequently invoked to exclude evidence is that of the privileged communication...
In furtherance of the national interest in an informed populace, the American press has evolved into...
This Comment focuses on the confidential communication privileges recognized under federal and Virgi...
The giving of admissible evidence of opinion by experts and the concept of ‘litigation privilege’ ea...
Within certain limitations, the law immunizes confidential communications made to an attorney, spous...
In May 2009, a bare majority of the Supreme Court of North Carolina decided State v. Rollins, making...
In the conduct of their affairs the various executive departments and administrative agencies acquir...
In the conduct of their affairs the various executive departments and administrative agencies acquir...
Recent incidents of newsmen being imprisoned for refusing to disclose confidential news sources befo...
This article examines all aspects of proposed federal rules of evidence affecting marital privilege ...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
In civil litigation courts often deal with information that is subject to a previously imposed restr...
Frequently in litigation in the federal courts, discovery of papers, documents and the like in the p...
This comment first examines the recent cases in which a libel plaintiff was impeded by the use of a ...
xii, 367 leaves :ill. (some col.) ; 30cm Includes bibliographical references. "25 October 2006". Uni...
One of the rules most frequently invoked to exclude evidence is that of the privileged communication...
In furtherance of the national interest in an informed populace, the American press has evolved into...
This Comment focuses on the confidential communication privileges recognized under federal and Virgi...
The giving of admissible evidence of opinion by experts and the concept of ‘litigation privilege’ ea...