Under the judicially created public policy doctrine, the deductibility as a business expense of a payment imposed for a statutory violation turned on whether the payment was penal, or whether it was compensatory. If penal, it was nondeductible, but if compensatory, it was deductible. Congress codified this judicial result in 1969. This Comment argues that Congress should have also codified this penal-compensatory test of deductibility in the case of payments imposed in ordinary civil suits. That is, a payment of punitive damages should not be deductible as a business expense
The comment will first define the threshold requirement of actual knowledge of the wrong as an indic...
This Note argues that the Tax Court\u27s more liberal interpretation is correct because it more near...
This paper explores the possibility of subjecting such an administrative ruling to judicial review i...
The growth of punitive damages awards has made the tax consequences of such awards increasingly impo...
This Note evaluates the merits of Revenue Ruling 74-323. First, it asserts that, while not arbitrary...
Currently, the tax law denies a deduction for business expenses that violate a federal or state law ...
Taxpayer, a broker and underwriter, was convicted for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and t...
Taxpayer, a securities dealer, was tried and convicted of mail fraud and of fraud under the 1933 Sec...
In “Taxing Punitive Damages,” Gregg D. Polsky and Dan Markel argue that defendants paying punitive d...
There is a curious anomaly in the law of punitive damages. Jurors assess punitive damages in the amo...
In our recent article, Taxing Punitive Damages, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1421879, we ar...
A series of recent and controversial cases has raised the issue of how plaintiffs must treat attorne...
Petitioners were members of a partnership engaged in the wholesale distribution of beer in Washingto...
Under tax law in 1993, depreciation of many purchased intangibles was denied on the theory that they...
The Internal Revenue Service and the courts have wavered on whether punitive damages are taxable und...
The comment will first define the threshold requirement of actual knowledge of the wrong as an indic...
This Note argues that the Tax Court\u27s more liberal interpretation is correct because it more near...
This paper explores the possibility of subjecting such an administrative ruling to judicial review i...
The growth of punitive damages awards has made the tax consequences of such awards increasingly impo...
This Note evaluates the merits of Revenue Ruling 74-323. First, it asserts that, while not arbitrary...
Currently, the tax law denies a deduction for business expenses that violate a federal or state law ...
Taxpayer, a broker and underwriter, was convicted for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and t...
Taxpayer, a securities dealer, was tried and convicted of mail fraud and of fraud under the 1933 Sec...
In “Taxing Punitive Damages,” Gregg D. Polsky and Dan Markel argue that defendants paying punitive d...
There is a curious anomaly in the law of punitive damages. Jurors assess punitive damages in the amo...
In our recent article, Taxing Punitive Damages, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1421879, we ar...
A series of recent and controversial cases has raised the issue of how plaintiffs must treat attorne...
Petitioners were members of a partnership engaged in the wholesale distribution of beer in Washingto...
Under tax law in 1993, depreciation of many purchased intangibles was denied on the theory that they...
The Internal Revenue Service and the courts have wavered on whether punitive damages are taxable und...
The comment will first define the threshold requirement of actual knowledge of the wrong as an indic...
This Note argues that the Tax Court\u27s more liberal interpretation is correct because it more near...
This paper explores the possibility of subjecting such an administrative ruling to judicial review i...