This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s thesis in his book Forbidden Grounds: The Case against Employment Discrimination. The Article argues that Epstein fails to follow through on his own terms. The author expresses disagreement with Epstein\u27s invocation of Thomas Hobbes without considering the Hobbesian argument for Title VII. Mr. McAdams also notes that Epstein relies on economic analysis without disclosing its dependence on controversial empirical assumptions. The author uncovers Epstein\u27s other inconsistencies: his empirical claims, particularly about social norms, where Epstein does not apply the standards of criticism to supporting evidence that he applies to contrary evidence
Some people would be dismayed to find their ideas almost universally rejected, but not Richard Epste...
As quickly as the twinkling of an eye, Professor Epstein acknowledges dutifully America\u27s history...
This Article makes the argument that broad principles often get in the way of sensible public policy...
This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s argument that Congress should repeal Title VII expresse...
This Article focuses on how Richard Epstein\u27s discrimination analysis in his book Forbidden Groun...
This Article explores a more conservative viewpoint than Richard Epstein\u27s view that all employme...
In his book Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws, Richard Epstein atta...
In the midst of a brilliantly independent academic career, Richard Epstein wrote perhaps his most co...
Professor Epstein\u27s critique centers around a conflict between the moral certainty behind civil...
In this Article, Professor Abrams responds to Professor Richard Epstein\u27s Forward in the November...
This Article takes a close look at the government\u27s determination of the substantive meaning of n...
Forbidden Grounds fails to follow through on its own terms. Epstein invokes Thomas Hobbes but never ...
In Forbidden Grounds, Richard Epstein argues that we should repeal laws prohibiting various forms of...
Prof. Richard H. McAdams, Bernard D. Meltzer Professor of Law University of Chicago Law School
Richard Epstein has written a provocative challenge to prevailing wisdom of the essential correctnes...
Some people would be dismayed to find their ideas almost universally rejected, but not Richard Epste...
As quickly as the twinkling of an eye, Professor Epstein acknowledges dutifully America\u27s history...
This Article makes the argument that broad principles often get in the way of sensible public policy...
This Article criticizes Richard Epstein\u27s argument that Congress should repeal Title VII expresse...
This Article focuses on how Richard Epstein\u27s discrimination analysis in his book Forbidden Groun...
This Article explores a more conservative viewpoint than Richard Epstein\u27s view that all employme...
In his book Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws, Richard Epstein atta...
In the midst of a brilliantly independent academic career, Richard Epstein wrote perhaps his most co...
Professor Epstein\u27s critique centers around a conflict between the moral certainty behind civil...
In this Article, Professor Abrams responds to Professor Richard Epstein\u27s Forward in the November...
This Article takes a close look at the government\u27s determination of the substantive meaning of n...
Forbidden Grounds fails to follow through on its own terms. Epstein invokes Thomas Hobbes but never ...
In Forbidden Grounds, Richard Epstein argues that we should repeal laws prohibiting various forms of...
Prof. Richard H. McAdams, Bernard D. Meltzer Professor of Law University of Chicago Law School
Richard Epstein has written a provocative challenge to prevailing wisdom of the essential correctnes...
Some people would be dismayed to find their ideas almost universally rejected, but not Richard Epste...
As quickly as the twinkling of an eye, Professor Epstein acknowledges dutifully America\u27s history...
This Article makes the argument that broad principles often get in the way of sensible public policy...