Add to ORKGThe investigators decided that Victim No.1 probably believed the area was safe because it had been checked by the dog. They were unable to draw any meaningful conclusions about the dog\u27s performance on that day . They felt that Victim No.1 was not sufficiently systematic in his detector search
The victim was working in an area of low brush adjacent to a (then) disused farm vehicle track. He w...
The investigators determined that the victim did not use a tripwire feeler before using the detector...
Anxious to speed up progress, the victim decided to carry out a reconnaissance . He checked a detec...
The victim said that the dogs checked a leash length (8m) and both dogs indicated a suspect point. T...
The demining group were ready to start work at 08:40 but bad weather prevented work until 11:30 when...
Both of the handlers were going over the area they were supposed to check with their EDDs, since it ...
The investigators determined that the victim was working on the ridge of a stony hill [photographs s...
This team was demining in an area of very difficult terrain. Dogs were the best solution to the prob...
The site of the accident was indicated by two dogs and the two victims moved forward to investigate....
The investigators determined that a dog had indicated a reading and Victim No.1 used his detector at...
The investigator concluded that the accident occurred as a result of the victim\u27s total disregar...
The investigators determined that, after a dog had signalled at a spot, the deminer located a signal...
The investigators determined that the victim had checked the area with a detector then started to cu...
Two dogs were run over the accident site and both signalled positively. The victim started searching...
The investigators determined that the victim was checking the boundary land and got a reading with h...
The victim was working in an area of low brush adjacent to a (then) disused farm vehicle track. He w...
The investigators determined that the victim did not use a tripwire feeler before using the detector...
Anxious to speed up progress, the victim decided to carry out a reconnaissance . He checked a detec...
The victim said that the dogs checked a leash length (8m) and both dogs indicated a suspect point. T...
The demining group were ready to start work at 08:40 but bad weather prevented work until 11:30 when...
Both of the handlers were going over the area they were supposed to check with their EDDs, since it ...
The investigators determined that the victim was working on the ridge of a stony hill [photographs s...
This team was demining in an area of very difficult terrain. Dogs were the best solution to the prob...
The site of the accident was indicated by two dogs and the two victims moved forward to investigate....
The investigators determined that a dog had indicated a reading and Victim No.1 used his detector at...
The investigator concluded that the accident occurred as a result of the victim\u27s total disregar...
The investigators determined that, after a dog had signalled at a spot, the deminer located a signal...
The investigators determined that the victim had checked the area with a detector then started to cu...
Two dogs were run over the accident site and both signalled positively. The victim started searching...
The investigators determined that the victim was checking the boundary land and got a reading with h...
The victim was working in an area of low brush adjacent to a (then) disused farm vehicle track. He w...
The investigators determined that the victim did not use a tripwire feeler before using the detector...
Anxious to speed up progress, the victim decided to carry out a reconnaissance . He checked a detec...