Add to ORKGThe scope of this article is four-fold: (1) a description of the principal methods used to provide legal assistance to persons charged with criminal offenses; (2) a discussion of when legal assistance is constitutionally required and actually needed; (3
When he was nearing the end of his distinguished career, one of my former law professors observed th...
As we mark the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon, in this Article I argue that we can and should be mor...
Following the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals ...
The scope of this article is four-fold: (1) a description of the principal methods used to provide l...
Gideon’s Trumpet is a study in depth of the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), in wh...
Regardless of one\u27s feelings about the desirability of the states providing counsel for a crimina...
There is general agreement that the “promise” of Gideon has been systematically denied to large numb...
In this newsletter article, Professor Connelly discusses the difficulties faced by indigent prisoner...
Barker v. Wingo, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Vermont v. Brillon discuss principles and declarations of...
In 1996, the State of South Carolina charged Larry McVay with common-law robbery. McVay, who was emp...
The Right to Counsel in Nebraska State Courts Financing the Indigent’s Legal Services Right to Couns...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, twenty-three state attorneys general, led by Walter F. Mondale and Edward M...
Once the darling of the legal academy, criminal procedure has fallen into disrepute. Thirty-five yea...
Many accounts of Gideon v. Wainwright’s legacy focus on what Gideon did not do—its doctrinal and pra...
In a brief working paper sent to all conference participants, Professor Burt Neuborne suggested that...
When he was nearing the end of his distinguished career, one of my former law professors observed th...
As we mark the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon, in this Article I argue that we can and should be mor...
Following the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals ...
The scope of this article is four-fold: (1) a description of the principal methods used to provide l...
Gideon’s Trumpet is a study in depth of the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), in wh...
Regardless of one\u27s feelings about the desirability of the states providing counsel for a crimina...
There is general agreement that the “promise” of Gideon has been systematically denied to large numb...
In this newsletter article, Professor Connelly discusses the difficulties faced by indigent prisoner...
Barker v. Wingo, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Vermont v. Brillon discuss principles and declarations of...
In 1996, the State of South Carolina charged Larry McVay with common-law robbery. McVay, who was emp...
The Right to Counsel in Nebraska State Courts Financing the Indigent’s Legal Services Right to Couns...
In Gideon v. Wainwright, twenty-three state attorneys general, led by Walter F. Mondale and Edward M...
Once the darling of the legal academy, criminal procedure has fallen into disrepute. Thirty-five yea...
Many accounts of Gideon v. Wainwright’s legacy focus on what Gideon did not do—its doctrinal and pra...
In a brief working paper sent to all conference participants, Professor Burt Neuborne suggested that...
When he was nearing the end of his distinguished career, one of my former law professors observed th...
As we mark the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon, in this Article I argue that we can and should be mor...
Following the Court’s decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, popular opinion allowed indignant criminals ...