Add to ORKGThis Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prerogative to draw inferences from circumstantial evidence. Judges have arrogated to themselves the power to dismiss cases if they find the proffered inferen
Over the years, the courts have developed numerous devices for controlling the jury in the exercise ...
The trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central ...
Civil presumption doctrine in the United States is unnecessarily complex and essentially unnecessary...
This Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prer...
For at least two centuries, Anglo-American courts have responded to a party\u27s evidence tampering ...
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the disse...
This Article proposes that courts should refrain from imposing adverse inference jury instructions a...
Fact inferences made by the trial judge are the lynchpin of civil litigation. If inferences were a m...
Lawyers routinely make strategic advocacy choices that reflect directly, if inferentially, on the cr...
The potential effects of stricken evidence on jurors' decisions is a problem for legal proceedings, ...
In Nebraska a directed verdicts based on circumstantial evidence leading to an inference presents a ...
During the past decade, particularly during the years immediately following the California Supreme C...
Empirical research indicates that jurors routinely undervalue circumstantial evidence (DNA, fingerpr...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
In examining the law of evidence relative to the functions served by the device called “rebuttable p...
Over the years, the courts have developed numerous devices for controlling the jury in the exercise ...
The trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central ...
Civil presumption doctrine in the United States is unnecessarily complex and essentially unnecessary...
This Article examines a disturbing trend in civil litigation: the demise of the jury’s historic prer...
For at least two centuries, Anglo-American courts have responded to a party\u27s evidence tampering ...
This article will offer nonempirical grounds to show that instructed inferences operate as the disse...
This Article proposes that courts should refrain from imposing adverse inference jury instructions a...
Fact inferences made by the trial judge are the lynchpin of civil litigation. If inferences were a m...
Lawyers routinely make strategic advocacy choices that reflect directly, if inferentially, on the cr...
The potential effects of stricken evidence on jurors' decisions is a problem for legal proceedings, ...
In Nebraska a directed verdicts based on circumstantial evidence leading to an inference presents a ...
During the past decade, particularly during the years immediately following the California Supreme C...
Empirical research indicates that jurors routinely undervalue circumstantial evidence (DNA, fingerpr...
In this article, I argue that the new focus on the risks of spurious expertise compels attention t...
In examining the law of evidence relative to the functions served by the device called “rebuttable p...
Over the years, the courts have developed numerous devices for controlling the jury in the exercise ...
The trial of Robert E. Chambers, Jr., for the murder of eighteen year old Jennifer Levin in Central ...
Civil presumption doctrine in the United States is unnecessarily complex and essentially unnecessary...