Add to ORKGIn this brief comment I want to explore the reasons for this phenomenon. I will illustrate my point by reference to the seminal case of Myers v. United States, which is not discussed in the symposium contribution by Calabresi and Yoo not surprising, because that case was decided well after the period upon which they focus here. After that, I will suggest some reasons why the removal power, despite its limited substantive importance, retains its grip on the academic and political imagination
A model of institutional rational choice is presented to describe the actual practice of the separat...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions that the President has an unconditional or indefeasible remo...
The U.S. Constitution parcels legislative, executive, and judicial powers among the separate b...
In this brief comment I want to explore the reasons for this phenomenon. I will illustrate my point ...
Why have there been such wide divergences in the cases involving executive power to remove? This Art...
There is a certain irony about the stimulating papers by Louis Fisher and Peter Shane: the political...
The contemporary debate over presidential power often assumes that removal is the primary tool throu...
Although both constitutional theory and practical considerations offer powerful reasons for Congress...
Fifty years after it was handed down, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co....
US Federal Courts and Inter-Branch War Powers Author: Erica Fields, with Dr. Jasmine Farrier and D...
This article was requested by The Judges Journal for inclusion in a symposium devoted to the status ...
The aim of the first section is to examine the judiciary\u27s contribution to executive hegemony in ...
In recent decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly interventionist on issues relating...
In this essay Professor Pierce argues that the Court should use a strict functional approach in its ...
This article argues that contemporary syndromes of constitutional dysfunction do not solely stem fro...
A model of institutional rational choice is presented to describe the actual practice of the separat...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions that the President has an unconditional or indefeasible remo...
The U.S. Constitution parcels legislative, executive, and judicial powers among the separate b...
In this brief comment I want to explore the reasons for this phenomenon. I will illustrate my point ...
Why have there been such wide divergences in the cases involving executive power to remove? This Art...
There is a certain irony about the stimulating papers by Louis Fisher and Peter Shane: the political...
The contemporary debate over presidential power often assumes that removal is the primary tool throu...
Although both constitutional theory and practical considerations offer powerful reasons for Congress...
Fifty years after it was handed down, the Supreme Court\u27s decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co....
US Federal Courts and Inter-Branch War Powers Author: Erica Fields, with Dr. Jasmine Farrier and D...
This article was requested by The Judges Journal for inclusion in a symposium devoted to the status ...
The aim of the first section is to examine the judiciary\u27s contribution to executive hegemony in ...
In recent decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly interventionist on issues relating...
In this essay Professor Pierce argues that the Court should use a strict functional approach in its ...
This article argues that contemporary syndromes of constitutional dysfunction do not solely stem fro...
A model of institutional rational choice is presented to describe the actual practice of the separat...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions that the President has an unconditional or indefeasible remo...
The U.S. Constitution parcels legislative, executive, and judicial powers among the separate b...