Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctrine and the subsequent deregulatory trend. Part II examines the FCC\u27s 2003 rule changes and the Third Circuit\u27s analysis of those modifications in Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC. Part III analyzes the assumptions underlying the FCC\u27s proffered explanation for its rule changes, ultimately concluding that they lack justification, and offers suggestions for responsible ownership deregulation. Part IV calls on Congress to reassert itself as the final arbiter of media policy
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
The Federal Communications Commission adopted an order on June 2, 2003 that modified five of its me...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
The recent Federal Communications Commission deregulation of many aspects of radio station programmi...
The FCC’s strict control over radio broadcasting has faced increased scrutiny since the popularizati...
The FCC’s strict control over radio broadcasting has faced increased scrutiny since the popularizati...
This thesis poses the argument that the Fairness Doctrine, which grew out of the “public interest” r...
In August 1984, the Federal Communications Commission released the Report and Order in the Matter of...
Few areas of federal oversight have been as inconsistently addressed as that involving the regulatio...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
The Federal Communications Commission adopted an order on June 2, 2003 that modified five of its me...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
Part I traces the history of broadcast regulation, emphasizing the development of the scarcity doctr...
The recent Federal Communications Commission deregulation of many aspects of radio station programmi...
The FCC’s strict control over radio broadcasting has faced increased scrutiny since the popularizati...
The FCC’s strict control over radio broadcasting has faced increased scrutiny since the popularizati...
This thesis poses the argument that the Fairness Doctrine, which grew out of the “public interest” r...
In August 1984, the Federal Communications Commission released the Report and Order in the Matter of...
Few areas of federal oversight have been as inconsistently addressed as that involving the regulatio...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
American television and radio broadcasters are uniquely privileged among Federal Communications Co...
The Federal Communications Commission adopted an order on June 2, 2003 that modified five of its me...