A new more effective civil enforcement tool – a Section 14B Court Order – was introduced in 2012 to enhance Ireland’s competition law. Breaching such an order is contempt of court. Fines can be imposed by the courts for contempt, but not for civil breaches of competition law. Notwithstanding the advantages of Section 14B Court Orders, since 2012 the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, Ireland’s competition agency, has only used such orders on only one occasion – in 2012. There have, however, been a number of other cases where the evidence, albeit limited, suggests that such orders would have been a credible option
The term ‘passing-on’ in the framework of private enforcement of European competition law has been a...
peer reviewedThe details of available remedies, enforcement mechanisms and conditions of litigation ...
This paper addresses a lesser-explored dimension of the 2004 EC competition reforms – side effects o...
A new more effective civil enforcement tool – a Section 14B Court Order – was introduced in 2012 to ...
On 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal in Ireland’s first bid-rigging case determined that the €7,500 f...
The paper argues that the sentences imposed on 31 May 2107 by the Central Criminal Court in the comm...
peer-reviewedIreland’s first commitment agreement to be ruled by the High Court was ruled on Decembe...
In 2021 the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), Ireland’s competition agency, adv...
This volume contains papers presented at the 18th Annual EU Competition Law and Policy Workshop. The...
Part II of this article continues the discussion of all competition law cases before the domestic co...
Competition authorities are known for imposing enormous fines on companies that have infringed the l...
In this issue, the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement introduces a new section discussing recent deve...
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) allegations of price signalling in 2015 an...
In competition law, 'access to justice is commonly associated with compensating victims of anticompe...
In the European Union (“EU”) public enforcement of competition law prevails. Private enforcement is ...
The term ‘passing-on’ in the framework of private enforcement of European competition law has been a...
peer reviewedThe details of available remedies, enforcement mechanisms and conditions of litigation ...
This paper addresses a lesser-explored dimension of the 2004 EC competition reforms – side effects o...
A new more effective civil enforcement tool – a Section 14B Court Order – was introduced in 2012 to ...
On 20 June 2018 the Court of Appeal in Ireland’s first bid-rigging case determined that the €7,500 f...
The paper argues that the sentences imposed on 31 May 2107 by the Central Criminal Court in the comm...
peer-reviewedIreland’s first commitment agreement to be ruled by the High Court was ruled on Decembe...
In 2021 the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), Ireland’s competition agency, adv...
This volume contains papers presented at the 18th Annual EU Competition Law and Policy Workshop. The...
Part II of this article continues the discussion of all competition law cases before the domestic co...
Competition authorities are known for imposing enormous fines on companies that have infringed the l...
In this issue, the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement introduces a new section discussing recent deve...
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) allegations of price signalling in 2015 an...
In competition law, 'access to justice is commonly associated with compensating victims of anticompe...
In the European Union (“EU”) public enforcement of competition law prevails. Private enforcement is ...
The term ‘passing-on’ in the framework of private enforcement of European competition law has been a...
peer reviewedThe details of available remedies, enforcement mechanisms and conditions of litigation ...
This paper addresses a lesser-explored dimension of the 2004 EC competition reforms – side effects o...