This paper provides a counter-argument to the notion that breastfeeding acts as an abortifacient and is thus the moral equivalent of abortion-causing drugs, e.g., Plan B or what is referred to as emergency contraception. Those who make this comparison do so in order to ridicule health professionals who refuse to prescribe or refer abortifacient-type contraceptive drugs and to ridicule laws that protect this right of conscience for healthcare professionals. In this paper I will provide evidence that breastfeeding does not induce early pregnancy loss and that it is not the moral equivalent to the administration of abortifacient-type drugs
While the nutritional, immunological and anti-bacterial benefits of breast milk are incontestable, t...
The World Health Organization reported that 40% of the pregnancies in the world in 1977 were unplann...
Combined estrogen/progestin contraceptive methods have a negative effect on breastfeeding duration w...
Pro-life Christian ethicists and medical practitioners have been united in their opposition to abort...
There is a common notion that contraception is necessary for women (and couples) to avoid unwanted p...
Does contraception contribute to better maternal health beyond its potential to reduce the proportio...
Recently, there has been a growing controversy, especially among evangelicals, over whether the birt...
If personhood begins at the moment of conception, the failure of an embryo to implant results in the...
Conventional public health wisdom suggests that breastfeeding has an important fertility-reducing ef...
This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by phar...
Numerous policy changes have expanded access to emergency contraception, such as Plan B®, in recent ...
Selected Paper of 2nd Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education (GLOBE-EDU 2015) August ...
In this essay, I make the argument that abortion and contraception are fundamentally different acti...
Since the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in 2007, more U.S. abortion providers ...
The view that vaginal breech birth is unjustifiable due to neonatal safety concerns has resulted in ...
While the nutritional, immunological and anti-bacterial benefits of breast milk are incontestable, t...
The World Health Organization reported that 40% of the pregnancies in the world in 1977 were unplann...
Combined estrogen/progestin contraceptive methods have a negative effect on breastfeeding duration w...
Pro-life Christian ethicists and medical practitioners have been united in their opposition to abort...
There is a common notion that contraception is necessary for women (and couples) to avoid unwanted p...
Does contraception contribute to better maternal health beyond its potential to reduce the proportio...
Recently, there has been a growing controversy, especially among evangelicals, over whether the birt...
If personhood begins at the moment of conception, the failure of an embryo to implant results in the...
Conventional public health wisdom suggests that breastfeeding has an important fertility-reducing ef...
This paper addresses the likely impact on women of being denied emergency contraception (EC) by phar...
Numerous policy changes have expanded access to emergency contraception, such as Plan B®, in recent ...
Selected Paper of 2nd Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education (GLOBE-EDU 2015) August ...
In this essay, I make the argument that abortion and contraception are fundamentally different acti...
Since the Supreme Court upheld the partial birth abortion ban in 2007, more U.S. abortion providers ...
The view that vaginal breech birth is unjustifiable due to neonatal safety concerns has resulted in ...
While the nutritional, immunological and anti-bacterial benefits of breast milk are incontestable, t...
The World Health Organization reported that 40% of the pregnancies in the world in 1977 were unplann...
Combined estrogen/progestin contraceptive methods have a negative effect on breastfeeding duration w...