Public understanding of climate change turns significantly on epistemic trust and distrust of those claiming rational-social authority. Attending to the ethics of expert/non-expert trust relations and to argumentation and rhetoric in popular climate discourse, I argue, illustrates the importance of epistemic trustworthiness for the social propagation of climate scientific knowledg
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been extraordinarily successful in the task...
We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and ...
Referring to public and academic debate about climate change, Philip Kitcher has said that it is “an...
Belief in climate change does not divide into a simple dichotomy of (good) believers and (evil) non...
The conventional explanation for controversy over climate change emphasizes impediments to public un...
This paper reviews and interrogates theories of climate science denialism, and climate science skept...
Like any science marked by high uncertainty, climate science is characterized by a widespread use of...
The climate-change debate in the U.S. has increasingly turned from discussing climate data and scien...
Around 97% of climate scientists endorse anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that human a...
Current consumption patterns are a strong accelerator of climate change. Therefore, switching to low...
Scientists overwhelmingly agree that climate change exists and is caused by human activity. It has b...
Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The pub...
The investigations and politically-motivated attacks taking place in climate change studies confirm ...
Although climate change rhetoric increasingly circulates in public discourse, serious debate about c...
It is commonly claimed that scientists should hold certain communicative virtues, such as sincerity,...
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been extraordinarily successful in the task...
We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and ...
Referring to public and academic debate about climate change, Philip Kitcher has said that it is “an...
Belief in climate change does not divide into a simple dichotomy of (good) believers and (evil) non...
The conventional explanation for controversy over climate change emphasizes impediments to public un...
This paper reviews and interrogates theories of climate science denialism, and climate science skept...
Like any science marked by high uncertainty, climate science is characterized by a widespread use of...
The climate-change debate in the U.S. has increasingly turned from discussing climate data and scien...
Around 97% of climate scientists endorse anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that human a...
Current consumption patterns are a strong accelerator of climate change. Therefore, switching to low...
Scientists overwhelmingly agree that climate change exists and is caused by human activity. It has b...
Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The pub...
The investigations and politically-motivated attacks taking place in climate change studies confirm ...
Although climate change rhetoric increasingly circulates in public discourse, serious debate about c...
It is commonly claimed that scientists should hold certain communicative virtues, such as sincerity,...
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been extraordinarily successful in the task...
We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and ...
Referring to public and academic debate about climate change, Philip Kitcher has said that it is “an...