On June 14, 2013, the Iowa Supreme Court released an opinion dealing with what constitutes “fairness” among minority and majority shareholders in the setting of a second generation family farm corporation which had experienced disagreements between cousins in the second generation.1 The facts of the case indicate that the parties had essentially ignored stock valuation for nearly 30-years while the value of assets was reaching record levels.2 The minority shareholder succeeded in getting an adverse decision in the District Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings
For businesses listed on the various stock exchanges or on an active over-the-counter market, the va...
The family-owned business exclusion, enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 contained nu...
Article 8 §12 of the Nebraska Constitution (popularly referred to as Initiative 300) establishes sev...
The Iowa Supreme Court case of Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc.,1 which was reversed and remanded to the Dis...
A recent Tax Court case, Estate of Smith v. Commissioner, has focused attention on the methodologies...
The rapid run-up in farm and ranch land values1 in recent years with real estate values reaching rec...
In South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. et. al. v. Hazeltine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Cir...
In 1982, Nebraska voters approved Proposition 300, Nebraska’s anti-corporate farming law. The Nebras...
In late January, 2004, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa reversed t...
A May 2017 decision by the Nebraska Court of Appeals deals with an unfortunately common situation in...
A decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, on July 18, 2001, affirmed a decision of the United...
In Smithfield Foods, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of...
For well over 700 years, the legal system in the common-law world has been oriented toward preventin...
A very brief decision by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on June 24, 2016, Methvin v. Commissione...
The hedge-to-arrive saga took another turn on November 6, 1998, with release of the Agricultural Law...
For businesses listed on the various stock exchanges or on an active over-the-counter market, the va...
The family-owned business exclusion, enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 contained nu...
Article 8 §12 of the Nebraska Constitution (popularly referred to as Initiative 300) establishes sev...
The Iowa Supreme Court case of Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc.,1 which was reversed and remanded to the Dis...
A recent Tax Court case, Estate of Smith v. Commissioner, has focused attention on the methodologies...
The rapid run-up in farm and ranch land values1 in recent years with real estate values reaching rec...
In South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc. et. al. v. Hazeltine, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Cir...
In 1982, Nebraska voters approved Proposition 300, Nebraska’s anti-corporate farming law. The Nebras...
In late January, 2004, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa reversed t...
A May 2017 decision by the Nebraska Court of Appeals deals with an unfortunately common situation in...
A decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, on July 18, 2001, affirmed a decision of the United...
In Smithfield Foods, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, the Federal District Court for the Southern District of...
For well over 700 years, the legal system in the common-law world has been oriented toward preventin...
A very brief decision by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on June 24, 2016, Methvin v. Commissione...
The hedge-to-arrive saga took another turn on November 6, 1998, with release of the Agricultural Law...
For businesses listed on the various stock exchanges or on an active over-the-counter market, the va...
The family-owned business exclusion, enacted as part of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 contained nu...
Article 8 §12 of the Nebraska Constitution (popularly referred to as Initiative 300) establishes sev...