For years the Supreme Court has struggled to set judicially manageable standards for cases involving partisan gerrymandering. The author argues that partisan gerrymandering is justiciable and that standards do exist
The political gerrymander has few friends among scholars and commentators. Even a majority on the Su...
While the Supreme Court in Bandemer v. Davis found partisan gerrymandering to be justiciable, no cha...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
Partisan redistricting effectively distorts election outcomes across the country and must be resolve...
Twice in the last two decades, the Supreme Court has come within two votes of declaring partisan ger...
The key insight in Professor Miriam Seifter’s outstanding article Countermajoritarian Legislatures i...
Political gerrymandering involves the intentional manipulation of legislative boundaries by one poli...
Electoral districting presents a risk of partisan gerrymandering: the manipulation of electoral boun...
In Vieth v. Jubelirer, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court determined that, at least for the mome...
In Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to Wisconsin’s state legislative map ba...
Gerrymandering (partisan redistricting) is widely believed to deprive citizens of meaningful partici...
Federal courts were once seen as the place for partisan gerrymandering challenges to be lodged, but ...
In November 2016, a federal court struck as unconstitutional Wisconsin’s redistricting map under bot...
In 2021, the Oregon Legislature succeeded in redrawing the state’s legislative and congressional dis...
The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering t...
The political gerrymander has few friends among scholars and commentators. Even a majority on the Su...
While the Supreme Court in Bandemer v. Davis found partisan gerrymandering to be justiciable, no cha...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...
Partisan redistricting effectively distorts election outcomes across the country and must be resolve...
Twice in the last two decades, the Supreme Court has come within two votes of declaring partisan ger...
The key insight in Professor Miriam Seifter’s outstanding article Countermajoritarian Legislatures i...
Political gerrymandering involves the intentional manipulation of legislative boundaries by one poli...
Electoral districting presents a risk of partisan gerrymandering: the manipulation of electoral boun...
In Vieth v. Jubelirer, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court determined that, at least for the mome...
In Gill v. Whitford, the Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to Wisconsin’s state legislative map ba...
Gerrymandering (partisan redistricting) is widely believed to deprive citizens of meaningful partici...
Federal courts were once seen as the place for partisan gerrymandering challenges to be lodged, but ...
In November 2016, a federal court struck as unconstitutional Wisconsin’s redistricting map under bot...
In 2021, the Oregon Legislature succeeded in redrawing the state’s legislative and congressional dis...
The case of Veith v. Jubelirer (2004) challenges us to find a standard for partisan gerrymandering t...
The political gerrymander has few friends among scholars and commentators. Even a majority on the Su...
While the Supreme Court in Bandemer v. Davis found partisan gerrymandering to be justiciable, no cha...
Partisan gerrymandering is frequently condemned for distorting democracy and causing unfair represen...