LEGAL REGULATION OF THE PETITIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA – THE QUESTION OF ITS NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK COHERENCE, POTENTIAL APPLICATION PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

Polazeći od toga da je ustavno pravo na predstavku, kao dio šireg pojma prava peticije, uređeno nizom različitih zakona i drugih propisa u Republici Hrvatskoj, u ovom radu nastoji se odgovoriti na istraživačko pitanje je li važeći normativni okvir uređenja predstavki koherentan. U tom cilju, u radu se pristupa pojmovnom određenju predstavke i izlaže način njezina pravnog uređenja u Republici Hrvatskoj, nakon čega se pobliže razmatraju razlike u važećem normativnom okviru i mogući problemi koji izviru iz postojećeg načina razrade toga ustavnog prava, ali i sugeriraju potencijalna rješenja. Usto, razmatraju se stvarni učinci izloženih propisa na postupanje državnih i drugih tijela po predstavkama, kao i različiti pristupi uređenju predstavki u usporednom pravu. Na toj podlozi, izvodi se zaključak o nekoherentnosti važećega normativnog okvira uređenja predstavki koji izvire iz, prvo, razlika u terminologiji, drugo, nepostojanja ustavne i zakonske definicije predstavke, treće, razlika u rokovima za davanje odgovora na predstavku, četvrto, razlika s obzirom na ovlaštenike prava na predstavku i, peto, razlika u pogledu sankcija za osobe koje onemogućuju ostvarenje toga ustavnog prava.Starting from the fact that the constitutional right to petition is governed by a series of different laws and regulations in the Republic of Croatia, the paper aims at answering the question of coherence of its normative framework. To this end, the author outlines the conceptual definition of the petition, presents its legal regulation in the Republic of Croatia, examines the differences in the current normative framework, as well as possible problems arising from the arrangement of this constitutional right, suggesting potential solutions. In addition, the author considers the actual effects of regulations, as well as various approaches in comparative law. On this basis, the conclusion has been drawn that the normative framework for the regulation of petitions is incoherent due to differences in terminology, the absence of constitutional and legal definition of the petition, different deadlines for the response to the petition, differences in the context of authorized petitioners, and differences regarding sanctions for the persons who hinder exercising of this constitutional right