PERMOHONAN KASASI PENUNTUT UMUM KARENA PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTI TIDAK BERDASARKAN SURAT DAKWAAN DAN PERTIMBANGAN JUDEX JURIS MENGADILI TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN (Studi Putusan Nomor : 2112K/PID.SUS/2014)

ABSTRAK HERDIANI ANGGRAINA SALAS NOVIANOCA. E0013214. 2017 PERMOHONAN KASASI PE-NUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTI DAN JUDEX JURIS TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKA-MAH AGUNG NOMOR : 2112 K/PID.SUS/2014). Penelitian ini mengkaji dan menjawab permasalahan mengenai pengajuan permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum terhadap putusan Judex Facti yang tidak berdasarkan surat dakwaan dan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan Judex Juris dalam mengadili dan mengabulkan permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum dalam perkara tindak pidana lingkungan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum diperoleh dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan cara studi pustaka. Bahan hukum yang diperoleh kemudian diolah menggunakan metode silogisme deduktif. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum karena putusan judex facti tidak berdasarkan pasal yang didakwakan dalam tindak pidana lingkungan, telah sesuai dengan Pasal 253 KUHAP, karena berdasarkan Pasal 182 ayat (4) KUHAP menyebutkan musyawarah terakhir untuk mengambil keputusan harus didasarkan atas surat dakwaan, berdasarkan yuris-prudensi putusan MA No. : 68 K/Kr/1973 dan No. : 47 K/Kr/1956, serta Putusan MA No. : 589K/Pid/1984. Pertimbangan judex juris mengadili dan mengabulkan permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum serta menyatakan Terdakwa bersalah me-lakukan tindak pidana lingkungan sesuai Pasal 256 jo. Pasal 193 ayat (1) KUHAP, karena MA dalam putusannya menerima permohonan kasasi Penuntut Umum dan membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Mataram Nomor : 91/PID/2013/PT. MTR. yang membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor : 244/PID. SUS/2013/ PN.MTR., dan MA mengadili sendiri dengan menyatakan Terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana “melaku-kan usaha dan/atau kegiatan tanpa memiliki izin lingkungan”. Kata Kunci : Kasasi, Penuntut Umum, Putusan Pengadilan ABSTRACT HERDIANI ANGGRAINA SALAS NOVIANOCA. E0013214. 2017. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S CASSATION APPEAL ON JUDEX FACTI AND JUDEX JURIS DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME (STUDY ON THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER : 2112 K/PID.SUS/2014). This study examines and answer the problems regarding the submission of the Public Prosecutor’s appeal against the decision of Judex Facti which is not based on the indictment and to know Judex Juris consideration in judgment and granted the public prosecutor’s appeal in the case of environmental crime. This study is a prescriptive and normative law applied. The approach used that approach to the case. Sources of legal materials obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. Mechanical collection of legal materials in this research is to study literature. Legal materials obtained are then processed using the method of deductive syllogism. The results of the study explained that the cassation Prosecution because Judex Facti decision not based article indicted in the environmental crime in accordance with Article 253 Criminal Procedure Code as based on Article 182 paragraph (4) Criminal Procedure Code, said deliberations last to take a decision should be based on indictment, based on the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court decision No. : 68 K/Cr/1973 and No. : 47 K/Cr/1956, as well as the Supreme Court Decision No. : 589K/Pid/1984. Consideration Judex Juris judge and granted the Public Prosecutor’s appeal and said the defendant guilty of the environmental crime, in accordance with Article 256 jo. Article 193 paragraph (1) Criminal Code, because Supreme Court in its decision received the Public Prosecutor’s appeal and overturned the decision of the High Court Mataram No. 91/PID/2013/PT. MTR. overturning of Mataram District Court decision No. 244/PID.SUS/2013/PN.MTR., And Supreme Court judge himself by stating defendant proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of “doing business and/or activities without having an environmental permit”. Keywords : Cassation, the Public Prosecutor, Court Judgmen