Background: The institutional affiliations and associated collaborative networks that scientists foster during their research careers are salient in the production of high-quality science. The phenomenon of multiple institutional affiliations and its relationship to research output remains relatively unexplored in the literature.Methods: We examined 27,612 scientific articles, modelling the normalized citation counts received against the number of authors and affiliations held.Results: In agreement with previous research, we found that teamwork is an important factor in high impact papers, with average citations received increasing concordant with the number of co-authors listed. For articles with more than five co-authors, we noted an incr...
In this paper we reconsider the investigation by \cite{moosa2016} using a much larger data set of al...
Researchers holding multiple affiliations can play an important bridging role between organizations,...
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biomedical researchers' collaborative and authors...
Background The institutional affiliations and associated collaborative networks that scientists fost...
The affiliation to an institution provides prestige and identity to researchers and determines acces...
Many studies have found that co-authored research is more highly cited than single author research. ...
Background: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure ...
The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with...
The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article due to be published by Wiley in the Journal of the Asso...
Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indire...
Co-authored articles tend to be more cited in many academic fields, but is this because they tend to...
This paper analyzes the effects of the co-authorship and bibliographic coupling networks on the cita...
AbstractObjectivesTo develop a method for investigating co-authorship patterns and author team chara...
In this paper we reconsider the investigation by \cite{moosa2016} using a much larger data set of al...
Researchers holding multiple affiliations can play an important bridging role between organizations,...
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biomedical researchers' collaborative and authors...
Background The institutional affiliations and associated collaborative networks that scientists fost...
The affiliation to an institution provides prestige and identity to researchers and determines acces...
Many studies have found that co-authored research is more highly cited than single author research. ...
Background: The analysis of co-authorship network aims at exploring the impact of network structure ...
The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with...
The effect of collaborators on institutions scientific impact was examined for 81 institutions with ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article due to be published by Wiley in the Journal of the Asso...
Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indire...
Co-authored articles tend to be more cited in many academic fields, but is this because they tend to...
This paper analyzes the effects of the co-authorship and bibliographic coupling networks on the cita...
AbstractObjectivesTo develop a method for investigating co-authorship patterns and author team chara...
In this paper we reconsider the investigation by \cite{moosa2016} using a much larger data set of al...
Researchers holding multiple affiliations can play an important bridging role between organizations,...
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biomedical researchers' collaborative and authors...