Building on the academic literature on state compliance with international norms, and focusing specifically on the business and human rights agenda, this article offers the first systematic analysis of the numerous roles that National Action Plans (NAPs) can play in fostering deep implementation of human rights norms. The article argues that this potential can be fully exploited only if the production of NAPs follows eight criteria. The process of NAP development should: (1) be based on a comprehensive baseline study/gap analysis; (2) include all relevant state agencies; (3) allow effective multi-stakeholder participation; and (4) continuously monitor implementation. In terms of content, NAPs should: (5) express firm commitment to implement...
When the United Nations was created in 1945, states were the only significant decision-makers. Even ...
The analysis compares the National Action Plans (NAPs) of several European countries and the United ...
What mechanisms facilitate state compliance with human rights? This article proposes and applies a m...
Building on the academic literature on state compliance with international norms, and focusing speci...
National Action Plans (NAPs) on business and human rights are a growing phenomenon. Since 2011, 42 s...
National Action Plans (NAPs) on business and human rights are a growing phenomenon. Since 2011, 42 s...
Research for this article was partly funded by Danida, “Realising the SDGS: The role of responsible ...
Since the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) were adopted by the UN Human Ri...
Adverse human rights impacts occur in business operations across all sectors.There is well documente...
The article examines the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (U...
As a global principal, corporations have the obligation to comply with national and international ha...
For decades, human rights advocates have called for greater corporate accountability in relation to ...
This article examines under what conditions benchmarking and associated measurement initiatives prod...
The issue of corporate responsibilities has had a tumultuous history at the United Nations. When the...
When the United Nations was created in 1945, states were the only significant decision-makers. Even ...
The analysis compares the National Action Plans (NAPs) of several European countries and the United ...
What mechanisms facilitate state compliance with human rights? This article proposes and applies a m...
Building on the academic literature on state compliance with international norms, and focusing speci...
National Action Plans (NAPs) on business and human rights are a growing phenomenon. Since 2011, 42 s...
National Action Plans (NAPs) on business and human rights are a growing phenomenon. Since 2011, 42 s...
Research for this article was partly funded by Danida, “Realising the SDGS: The role of responsible ...
Since the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) were adopted by the UN Human Ri...
Adverse human rights impacts occur in business operations across all sectors.There is well documente...
The article examines the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (U...
As a global principal, corporations have the obligation to comply with national and international ha...
For decades, human rights advocates have called for greater corporate accountability in relation to ...
This article examines under what conditions benchmarking and associated measurement initiatives prod...
The issue of corporate responsibilities has had a tumultuous history at the United Nations. When the...
When the United Nations was created in 1945, states were the only significant decision-makers. Even ...
The analysis compares the National Action Plans (NAPs) of several European countries and the United ...
What mechanisms facilitate state compliance with human rights? This article proposes and applies a m...