A non-governmental organization (NGO) can make a non-contractible investment to provide a public good. Only ownership can be specified ex ante, so ex post efficiency requires reaching an agreement with the government. Besley and Ghatak (2001) argue that the party with the larger valuation should be the owner. We show that when transaction costs have to be incurred before the bargaining stage can be reached, ownership by the government can be optimal even when the NGO has a larger valuation. Our finding also contrasts with the standard private-good setup where the investing party (i.e., the NGO) should always be the owner
In this paper, we discuss the relative merits of public and private ownership. Our starting point is...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...
A non-governmental organization (NGO) can make a non-contractible investment to provide a public goo...
A non-governmental organization (NGO) can make a non-contractible investment to provide a public goo...
Consider a non-governmental organization (NGO) that can invest in a public good. Should the governme...
AbstractConsider a non-governmental organization (NGO) that can invest in a public good. Should the ...
The government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a public goo...
The government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a public goo...
Consider two parties who can make non-contractible investments in the provision of a public good. Wh...
AbstractThe government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a pu...
The standard property rights approach is focused on ex ante investment incentives, while there are n...
AbstractThe standard property rights approach is focused on ex ante investment incentives, while the...
In this paper it is argued that privatization is not the only alternative to public ownership. Adopt...
In a property-rights framework, I study how organizational form and quantity contracts interact in g...
In this paper, we discuss the relative merits of public and private ownership. Our starting point is...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...
A non-governmental organization (NGO) can make a non-contractible investment to provide a public goo...
A non-governmental organization (NGO) can make a non-contractible investment to provide a public goo...
Consider a non-governmental organization (NGO) that can invest in a public good. Should the governme...
AbstractConsider a non-governmental organization (NGO) that can invest in a public good. Should the ...
The government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a public goo...
The government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a public goo...
Consider two parties who can make non-contractible investments in the provision of a public good. Wh...
AbstractThe government and a non-governmental organization (NGO) can invest in the provision of a pu...
The standard property rights approach is focused on ex ante investment incentives, while there are n...
AbstractThe standard property rights approach is focused on ex ante investment incentives, while the...
In this paper it is argued that privatization is not the only alternative to public ownership. Adopt...
In a property-rights framework, I study how organizational form and quantity contracts interact in g...
In this paper, we discuss the relative merits of public and private ownership. Our starting point is...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...
There has been a dramatic change in the division of responsibility between the state and the private...