We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional dispersion of consumption and wealth (relative to income). The basic model implies too little dispersion compared to the data, whereas a one-parameter extension to include rational inattention (limited information processing) delivers a better fit to both facts in general equilibrium. In particular, intertemporal substitution plays an important role in determining the two key dispersion moments via affecting the degree of optimal attention in equilibrium. Alternative models that rely on habit formation, incomplete information about current income, or borrowing constraints are not consistent with the facts we document
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
This paper develops a general equilibrium model with Dixit-Stiglitz preferences, monopolistic compet...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We propose a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the implications of ...
This paper derives the general equilibrium effects of rational inattention (or RI; Sims 2003, 2010) ...
This paper derives the general equilibrium effects of rational inattention (or RI; Sims 2003, 2010) ...
This paper studies how "rational inattention" (RI)-a type of information processing constraint propo...
In this paper we survey recent works on rational inattention (RI) in macroeconomics within the dynam...
In many markets, acquiring and processing the information needed to make optimal decisions costs age...
In this paper we survey recent works on rational inattention (RI) in macroeconomics within the dynam...
This paper studies consumption dynamics, asset returns and optimal portfolio choice, and welfare los...
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
This paper develops a general equilibrium model with Dixit-Stiglitz preferences, monopolistic compet...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We use a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the cross-sectional disp...
We propose a recursive utility version of a basic Huggett (1993) model to study the implications of ...
This paper derives the general equilibrium effects of rational inattention (or RI; Sims 2003, 2010) ...
This paper derives the general equilibrium effects of rational inattention (or RI; Sims 2003, 2010) ...
This paper studies how "rational inattention" (RI)-a type of information processing constraint propo...
In this paper we survey recent works on rational inattention (RI) in macroeconomics within the dynam...
In many markets, acquiring and processing the information needed to make optimal decisions costs age...
In this paper we survey recent works on rational inattention (RI) in macroeconomics within the dynam...
This paper studies consumption dynamics, asset returns and optimal portfolio choice, and welfare los...
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
We study the portfolio decision of a household with limited information-processing capacity (rationa...
This paper develops a general equilibrium model with Dixit-Stiglitz preferences, monopolistic compet...