Add to ORKGThe manner in which US presidential elections are organized make them ripe for empirical manifestations of the “voting paradoxes” identified by social choice theorists. This note illustrates the general point with polling data involving the two leading Democrats and the three leading Republicans at the beginning of the 2016 presidential primaries, suggesting that all five candidates may be alternatives in one or more cyclical majorities, i.e., where no candidate cannot be beaten by at least one other candidate
Session ID 38: Political EconomyIn a multi-candidate election, a voter may prefer to vote for his se...
Objective. This study advances the presidential primary literature in two ways. First, since many st...
Despite the current wall-to-wall coverage of the 2016 primary race, the primary elections themselves...
The manner in which US presidential elections are organized make them ripe for empirical manifestati...
The organization of US presidential elections make them potentially vulnerable to so-called “voting ...
Social choice theory in Economics and Political Science has highlighted that competing notions of ra...
Before the 2016 US presidential elections, more than 2,000 participants participated to a survey in ...
Before the 2016 US presidential elections, more than 2,000 participants participated to a survey in ...
This paper assesses the effectiveness of various ranked-choice voting systems, as compared to the cu...
When candidates in primary elections are ideologically differentiated (e.g., conservatives and moder...
International audienceThis paper presents data from a survey leading up to the 2016 US presidential ...
We present an incomplete information model of two-stage electoral competition, in which candidates c...
This paper provides an investigation of the role of momentum and social learning in sequential votin...
This paper investigates the role of momentum in sequential voting systems, such as the U.S. presiden...
The United States of America has become increasingly polarized, so elections are more important than...
Session ID 38: Political EconomyIn a multi-candidate election, a voter may prefer to vote for his se...
Objective. This study advances the presidential primary literature in two ways. First, since many st...
Despite the current wall-to-wall coverage of the 2016 primary race, the primary elections themselves...
The manner in which US presidential elections are organized make them ripe for empirical manifestati...
The organization of US presidential elections make them potentially vulnerable to so-called “voting ...
Social choice theory in Economics and Political Science has highlighted that competing notions of ra...
Before the 2016 US presidential elections, more than 2,000 participants participated to a survey in ...
Before the 2016 US presidential elections, more than 2,000 participants participated to a survey in ...
This paper assesses the effectiveness of various ranked-choice voting systems, as compared to the cu...
When candidates in primary elections are ideologically differentiated (e.g., conservatives and moder...
International audienceThis paper presents data from a survey leading up to the 2016 US presidential ...
We present an incomplete information model of two-stage electoral competition, in which candidates c...
This paper provides an investigation of the role of momentum and social learning in sequential votin...
This paper investigates the role of momentum in sequential voting systems, such as the U.S. presiden...
The United States of America has become increasingly polarized, so elections are more important than...
Session ID 38: Political EconomyIn a multi-candidate election, a voter may prefer to vote for his se...
Objective. This study advances the presidential primary literature in two ways. First, since many st...
Despite the current wall-to-wall coverage of the 2016 primary race, the primary elections themselves...