We present a model for academia with heterogeneous author types and endogenous effort to explain changes in the publication process in Economics. We analyze the implications of these developments on research output. Lowering the precision of refereeing signals has a negative impact on able authors but invites more submissions from less able authors. Increasing the number of journals stimulates less able authors to submit their papers. The editor can improve the journal's pool of submitted manuscripts by improving the precision of refereeing, but not by lowering quality standards. The submission strategy of an author is informative of his ability
Research must be published, otherwise it will be lost. The most important papers for a researcher to...
The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the...
The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses t...
We present a model for academia with heterogeneous author types and endogenous effort to evaluate re...
Survival in academia depends on publications in refereed journals. Authors only get their papers acc...
This paper studies the publishing game played by researchers and editors when the editors adopt an i...
In April 2013, all of the major academic publishing houses moved thousands of journal titles to an o...
Survival in academia depends on publications in refereed journals. Authors only get their papers acc...
The scientific community has been suffering from peer review for decades. This process (also called ...
This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University...
This paper considers the search for the best papers by the editors of an academic journal. Editors' ...
Do scholars adjust their publication behaviour depending on the criteria used in their evaluation? M...
A discussion of the state of scholarly publishing from the point of view of Melbourne University Pre...
The review process for academic journals in economics has grown vastly more extensive over time. Jou...
Referees' and editors' behavior is illustrated by data from a random sample of refereeing requests b...
Research must be published, otherwise it will be lost. The most important papers for a researcher to...
The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the...
The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses t...
We present a model for academia with heterogeneous author types and endogenous effort to evaluate re...
Survival in academia depends on publications in refereed journals. Authors only get their papers acc...
This paper studies the publishing game played by researchers and editors when the editors adopt an i...
In April 2013, all of the major academic publishing houses moved thousands of journal titles to an o...
Survival in academia depends on publications in refereed journals. Authors only get their papers acc...
The scientific community has been suffering from peer review for decades. This process (also called ...
This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University...
This paper considers the search for the best papers by the editors of an academic journal. Editors' ...
Do scholars adjust their publication behaviour depending on the criteria used in their evaluation? M...
A discussion of the state of scholarly publishing from the point of view of Melbourne University Pre...
The review process for academic journals in economics has grown vastly more extensive over time. Jou...
Referees' and editors' behavior is illustrated by data from a random sample of refereeing requests b...
Research must be published, otherwise it will be lost. The most important papers for a researcher to...
The advancement of various fields of science depends on the actions of individual scientists via the...
The study based on an online survey covering 655 researchers from hard and soft sciences addresses t...