The Evolution of India’s microfinance market – just a crack in the glass ceiling?

A crisis of microfinance in Andhra Pradesh (AP) is of highest interest to microfinance practitioners and scholars and politicians around the world, because some of the world’s largest microfinance institutions (MFIs) are based out of AP. The current crisis has shaken microfinance in India and beyond and fuelled a heated debate on the (de)merits of commercialization, going public and credit-drive of MFIs. However, regulators and politicians are liable for creating an adverse institutional set up (or ‘choice architecture’) – in many places but in India even more. The article shows which poor choices of MFIs flowed from the adverse choice architecture. In particular it highlights the failure of India’s regulators to create formal space for micro-savings and the tendency of politicians to look at (rural) credit as a means of patronage. It concludes that the current crisis is an expression of changes in power relations within MFIs, among practitioners in the MF sector and between the MF sector and the polity/community it operates in