Add to ORKGThis article looks at recent occasions where extrajudicial speech has been the subject of public comment in Ireland. It then examines case law from other jurisdictions, focusing on examples from common law countries and looking in some detail at the American experience, where formal rules have been drawn up and applied to a large number of cases. It attempts to distil these into a theory of how extra-judicial comment should be limited and to provide practical guidance.peer-reviewe
Using Northern Ireland as a model, this Article argues that some political dissidents have not recei...
There continues to be much diversity of judicial opinion in Australia about the permissibility of ne...
This article considers the dilemma faced by judges in the famous Ryan v Lennon case, arguing that th...
This paper explores the problems for judicial impartiality that a judge’s extrajudicial speaking or ...
The practice of judicial comment on the evidence has traditionally been the main form of jury contro...
Since the Second World War, judges in Australia and the United Kingdom have increasingly written leg...
Regulation is about control or steering of behaviours through the setting of norms, the monitoring o...
This Article examines how and why Supreme Court justices venture beyond their written opinions to sp...
The reference to foreign court judgments by the US Supreme Courts - particularly in cases involving ...
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA) has altered the channels of communication between the judic...
peer-reviewedIn Ireland, judges can only be removed as a result of ‘stated misbehaviour’ but the ext...
The multiple-publication rule, allowing for a new cause of action each time a defamatory statement ...
The purpose of this Comment is to explore briefly the fundamentals of what Prof. H. L. A. Hart has c...
The legislative description of types of judicial misbehaviour and the allocation of authority over c...
There continues to be much diversity of judicial opinion in Australia about the permissibility of ne...
Using Northern Ireland as a model, this Article argues that some political dissidents have not recei...
There continues to be much diversity of judicial opinion in Australia about the permissibility of ne...
This article considers the dilemma faced by judges in the famous Ryan v Lennon case, arguing that th...
This paper explores the problems for judicial impartiality that a judge’s extrajudicial speaking or ...
The practice of judicial comment on the evidence has traditionally been the main form of jury contro...
Since the Second World War, judges in Australia and the United Kingdom have increasingly written leg...
Regulation is about control or steering of behaviours through the setting of norms, the monitoring o...
This Article examines how and why Supreme Court justices venture beyond their written opinions to sp...
The reference to foreign court judgments by the US Supreme Courts - particularly in cases involving ...
The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (CRA) has altered the channels of communication between the judic...
peer-reviewedIn Ireland, judges can only be removed as a result of ‘stated misbehaviour’ but the ext...
The multiple-publication rule, allowing for a new cause of action each time a defamatory statement ...
The purpose of this Comment is to explore briefly the fundamentals of what Prof. H. L. A. Hart has c...
The legislative description of types of judicial misbehaviour and the allocation of authority over c...
There continues to be much diversity of judicial opinion in Australia about the permissibility of ne...
Using Northern Ireland as a model, this Article argues that some political dissidents have not recei...
There continues to be much diversity of judicial opinion in Australia about the permissibility of ne...
This article considers the dilemma faced by judges in the famous Ryan v Lennon case, arguing that th...