This paper studies the dynamics by which populations with heterogeneous preferences for public good provision sort themselves into communities. I conduct laboratory experiments to consider which institutions best facilitate efficient self-organization when residents can move freely between locations. I find that institutions requiring all residents of a community to pay equal taxes enable subjects to sort into stable, homogeneous communities. Though sorted, residents often fail to attain the provision level best suited for them. When residents can vote for local tax policies with ballots, along with their feet, each community converges to the most efficient outcome for its population
Abstract. We re-examine Tiebout’s hypothesis of endogenous sorting in a competitive spatial equilibr...
Fiscal Federalism, and a PIER conference on Political Economy, and the ASSA meeting in San Francisco...
Standard explanations for the income heterogeneity within neighborhoods rely on differences of prefe...
This paper studies the dynamics by which populations with heterogeneous preferences for local public...
This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where ...
The paper considers a two-community model with freely mobile individuals. Individuals differ not onl...
I study the dynamics of voluntary local public good provision in a free-mobility environment when ag...
This paper provides laboratory evidence on the efficiency-enhancing properties of the Tiebout model ...
In a seminal paper, Tiebout (1956) argues that a large number of small local governments will functi...
This classroom exercise illustrates the Tiebout (1956) hypothesis that residential sorting across mu...
Abstract. This paper provides laboratory evidence on the efficiency-enhancing properties of the Tieb...
Charles Tiebout’s (1956) suggestion that people “vote with their feet ” to find the commu-nity that ...
Abstract: This paper reexamine Tiebout’s hypothesis of endogenous sorting in a competi-tive spatial ...
We investigate the efficiency properties of population mobility when localities compete in an enviro...
Tiebout\u27s (1956) model of fiscal competition suggests income sorting between jurisdictions while ...
Abstract. We re-examine Tiebout’s hypothesis of endogenous sorting in a competitive spatial equilibr...
Fiscal Federalism, and a PIER conference on Political Economy, and the ASSA meeting in San Francisco...
Standard explanations for the income heterogeneity within neighborhoods rely on differences of prefe...
This paper studies the dynamics by which populations with heterogeneous preferences for local public...
This paper argues that long-run trends in geographic segregation are inconsistent with models where ...
The paper considers a two-community model with freely mobile individuals. Individuals differ not onl...
I study the dynamics of voluntary local public good provision in a free-mobility environment when ag...
This paper provides laboratory evidence on the efficiency-enhancing properties of the Tiebout model ...
In a seminal paper, Tiebout (1956) argues that a large number of small local governments will functi...
This classroom exercise illustrates the Tiebout (1956) hypothesis that residential sorting across mu...
Abstract. This paper provides laboratory evidence on the efficiency-enhancing properties of the Tieb...
Charles Tiebout’s (1956) suggestion that people “vote with their feet ” to find the commu-nity that ...
Abstract: This paper reexamine Tiebout’s hypothesis of endogenous sorting in a competi-tive spatial ...
We investigate the efficiency properties of population mobility when localities compete in an enviro...
Tiebout\u27s (1956) model of fiscal competition suggests income sorting between jurisdictions while ...
Abstract. We re-examine Tiebout’s hypothesis of endogenous sorting in a competitive spatial equilibr...
Fiscal Federalism, and a PIER conference on Political Economy, and the ASSA meeting in San Francisco...
Standard explanations for the income heterogeneity within neighborhoods rely on differences of prefe...