textCantwell v. Connecticut (1940) marked a new moment in religious liberties in the United States. In this case the Supreme Court nationalized free exercise of religion. While many legal scholars point to this case as important for precedents used in the arguments of subsequent cases, the context from which this case emerged was also important. I argue that Cantwell should also be studied for what it can tell us about religious conflict at the time. In Cantwell the Supreme Court of the United States incorporated the free exercise of religion to states, but in doing so it obscured the real religious tensions between Roman Catholics and Jehovah's Witnesses and local efforts to adjudicate those conflicts.Religious Studie
In several recent high-profile cases, federal district judges have issued injunctions that apply acr...
In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court added the injunction to executive licensing as a prior restr...
In 2007, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, sending “shockwaves...
textCantwell v. Connecticut (1940) marked a new moment in religious liberties in the United States. ...
In the wake of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and now in anticipation of Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc....
Cardozo\u27s opinion in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.\u27 hinges on a stark assertion about r...
“[I]n a complex society and an era of pervasive governmental regulation, defining the proper realm f...
Recently the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in a series of cases beginning with Ornelas v. U...
Hatred is as old as our civilization. So is the moral principle that one should not hate others and ...
The Supreme Court\u27s jurisprudence on church-state issues is unsettled. With respect to the Establ...
Last term, five Justices on the Supreme Court flirted with the possibility of revisiting the Court’s...
This Article recasts the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment by showing how its draft...
One of the debates often encountered by native southerners centers around our historical symbols. Th...
The parties in this case defend two sides of a many-sided circuit split. This brief argues that a th...
Supreme Court of Virginiahttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-court-records-vol267/1044/t...
In several recent high-profile cases, federal district judges have issued injunctions that apply acr...
In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court added the injunction to executive licensing as a prior restr...
In 2007, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, sending “shockwaves...
textCantwell v. Connecticut (1940) marked a new moment in religious liberties in the United States. ...
In the wake of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby and now in anticipation of Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc....
Cardozo\u27s opinion in Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.\u27 hinges on a stark assertion about r...
“[I]n a complex society and an era of pervasive governmental regulation, defining the proper realm f...
Recently the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in a series of cases beginning with Ornelas v. U...
Hatred is as old as our civilization. So is the moral principle that one should not hate others and ...
The Supreme Court\u27s jurisprudence on church-state issues is unsettled. With respect to the Establ...
Last term, five Justices on the Supreme Court flirted with the possibility of revisiting the Court’s...
This Article recasts the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment by showing how its draft...
One of the debates often encountered by native southerners centers around our historical symbols. Th...
The parties in this case defend two sides of a many-sided circuit split. This brief argues that a th...
Supreme Court of Virginiahttps://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/va-supreme-court-records-vol267/1044/t...
In several recent high-profile cases, federal district judges have issued injunctions that apply acr...
In Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court added the injunction to executive licensing as a prior restr...
In 2007, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, sending “shockwaves...