By its decision in the Eve case, the Supreme Court of Canada clarified and settled the law in at least two important respects. From now on, provincial statutes can only be used to authorize guardians to permit involuntary contraceptive sterilizations if their wording clearly and explicitly so provides. The Prince Edward Island statute in question did not do so. Secondly, though the Court's parens patriae jurisdiction is of unlimited scope and does extend to cases involving medical procedures, it cannot serve as the basis for authorizing non-therapeutic sterilizations. By ruling out the applicability of parens patriae, and by insisting that judges are not able to deal adequately with such cases, the Supreme Court may have strengthened the ca...
In 2015, Abortion Access Now PEI legally challenged the restrictive abortion policy of Prince Edward...
In 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada decriminalized abortion in R. v. Morgentaler. 1 Almost immediat...
In the recent case of R. v J.A, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that an uncon...
In 1986 the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in E. (Mrs.) v. Eve. In that case, an appl...
Le but de ce texte est de démontrer que l’arrêt Eve a relativement peu de pertinence en droit québéc...
Women in Canada are at risk of abortion becoming increasingly difficult to access. In its landmark 1...
This paper examines the phenomenon of non-consensual condom removal (NCCR) and its relationship to s...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
In this article, I examine the historical development of the criminal liability of women seeking to ...
Canada\u27s newest abortion legislation, embodied in Bill C-43, was defeated in the Senate on Januar...
Numéro complet.The legality of purely contraceptive sterilization / Robert P. Kouri -- Introduction ...
This article examines and critiques Canadian legal responses to disputes over frozen in vitro embryo...
In the spring of 2002, the Canadian federal government presented another bill respecting assisted hu...
In R v Kirkpatrick, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that consent to sexual activity ca...
The focus of this article is on the judicial application of Canada’s sexual assault doctrine in the ...
In 2015, Abortion Access Now PEI legally challenged the restrictive abortion policy of Prince Edward...
In 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada decriminalized abortion in R. v. Morgentaler. 1 Almost immediat...
In the recent case of R. v J.A, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that an uncon...
In 1986 the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in E. (Mrs.) v. Eve. In that case, an appl...
Le but de ce texte est de démontrer que l’arrêt Eve a relativement peu de pertinence en droit québéc...
Women in Canada are at risk of abortion becoming increasingly difficult to access. In its landmark 1...
This paper examines the phenomenon of non-consensual condom removal (NCCR) and its relationship to s...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
In this article, I examine the historical development of the criminal liability of women seeking to ...
Canada\u27s newest abortion legislation, embodied in Bill C-43, was defeated in the Senate on Januar...
Numéro complet.The legality of purely contraceptive sterilization / Robert P. Kouri -- Introduction ...
This article examines and critiques Canadian legal responses to disputes over frozen in vitro embryo...
In the spring of 2002, the Canadian federal government presented another bill respecting assisted hu...
In R v Kirkpatrick, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that consent to sexual activity ca...
The focus of this article is on the judicial application of Canada’s sexual assault doctrine in the ...
In 2015, Abortion Access Now PEI legally challenged the restrictive abortion policy of Prince Edward...
In 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada decriminalized abortion in R. v. Morgentaler. 1 Almost immediat...
In the recent case of R. v J.A, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada determined that an uncon...