Add to ORKGThis paper seeks to identify and examine the extent to which there are substantive differences between the common law and equitable tests for non-contractual mistaken transfers. As the title suggests, the discussion references the case of Pitt v Holt as invoking the analogy of law and equity being ‘pitted’ against each other
This article analyses the law of rectification for common mistake in the light of the decision of th...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
This paper argues that, accepting the division of unjust enrichment claims into enrichment by rights...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
Mistaken payment is the ‘core case’ of unjust enrichment, and it has had a powerful effect on the de...
In Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage, the English Court of Appeal rejected the equitable doct...
In Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruled on the conditions under which a voluntary dee...
A definitive version is available online on a current, full text basis on the Westlaw database - htt...
The article explores the circumstances in which common law damages might be available for purely equ...
This thesis examines the law's response to defective transfers and other misapplications of assets a...
The traditional rule at common law precluded restitution for payments made by mistake where the paye...
The law of restitution and unjust enrichment has emerged as an important and independent branch of p...
The law of unjust enrichment has often been described as the law of events materially identical to a...
The English law of unjust, or unjustified, enrichment is part of the civil law of obligations, which...
This article analyses the law of rectification for common mistake in the light of the decision of th...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
This paper argues that, accepting the division of unjust enrichment claims into enrichment by rights...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
In this paper I ask whether English Law should permit rescission for unilateral mistakes in the form...
Mistaken payment is the ‘core case’ of unjust enrichment, and it has had a powerful effect on the de...
In Great Peace Shipping v Tsavliris Salvage, the English Court of Appeal rejected the equitable doct...
In Pitt v Holt [2013] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruled on the conditions under which a voluntary dee...
A definitive version is available online on a current, full text basis on the Westlaw database - htt...
The article explores the circumstances in which common law damages might be available for purely equ...
This thesis examines the law's response to defective transfers and other misapplications of assets a...
The traditional rule at common law precluded restitution for payments made by mistake where the paye...
The law of restitution and unjust enrichment has emerged as an important and independent branch of p...
The law of unjust enrichment has often been described as the law of events materially identical to a...
The English law of unjust, or unjustified, enrichment is part of the civil law of obligations, which...
This article analyses the law of rectification for common mistake in the light of the decision of th...
The paper discusses the history of the English law doctrine according to which the mistake of law (e...
This paper argues that, accepting the division of unjust enrichment claims into enrichment by rights...